Zdravo CasinoGuru timu,
Hvala vam što nastavljate da istražujete ovo. Želeo bih da odgovorim na najnoviju poruku Shuffle Casino-a, jer nekoliko njihovih izjava nije tačno i ne rešava suštinu problema.
1. Njihova cela odbrana je da nisam otpremio svoj ID na ostale naloge.
Upravo je to problem. Otvorio sam 10+ naloga, sve koristeći:
Isti uređaj
Ista IP adresa/lokacija
Iste adrese kripto novčanika (SOL, LTC, AVAX, XRP)
Isti novčanik za povlačenje
Isti broj telefona ili varijacije mog broja
Ista adresa i adrese novčanika
Ista imena
Isti grad, adresa
Uprkos svemu ovome, i uprkos činjenici da tvrde da imaju „interne mere", ipak sam uspeo da uplatim preko 22.000 dolara za nekoliko nedelja, uključujući 4.000 dolara samo danas, sve nakon što je žalba već bila na razmatranju. Svi su sa iste adrese Solana i AVAX i ltc.
Da su njihovi interni sistemi funkcionisali, ne bi trebalo da mi bude dozvoljeno da uplaćujem dalje depozite ni na jedan račun — posebno ne nakon što sam toliko izgubio.
2. Njihova tvrdnja o „nelojalnosti" je nepravedna i netačna.
Da sam nameravao da se sakrijem ili počinim prevaru, ne bih stalno koristio isti blokčejn novčanik na svakom nalogu.
Kripto transakcije su transparentne — jasno se vidi da sve dolaze iz istog izvora.
Nijedan prevarni kockar ne koristi isti novčanik 10+ puta.
Realnost je jednostavna:
Njihov sistem je to dozvoljavao.
Prihvatili su svaki depozit bez pogovora.
Ovo je propust u odgovornom igranju i KYC-u na strani kazina, a ne moj.
3. Nisam pokušavao da tvrdim da nema nepovezanih gubitaka — pokušavam da pokažem obrazac neodgovornog prihvatanja depozita.
Svaki depozit — bilo na računu 1 ili računu 10 — dolazio je od iste osobe, istog novčanika, istog uređaja, što su mogli lako da provere.
Ne bi trebalo da prihvataju neograničene depozite sa neproverenih naloga nakon što vide toliko ponovljenih registracija iz istog izvora.
4. Kazino je ignorisao pitanje koje je postavio CasinoGuru.
CasinoGuru je pitao Shuffle Casino:
„Koje ste mere preduzeli da biste sprečili da se ovo dogodi?"
Šaflov odgovor nije odgovorio na to.
Samo su tvrdili da „imaju interne mere", ali ih neće otkriti — dok su istovremeno te mere očigledno propale, jer sam nastavio da uplaćujem hiljade čak i danas, nakon njihove izjave.
5. NE tražim odgovornost za sve gubitke. Tražim odgovornost za depozite koje nikada nisu smeli da dozvole.
Kao minimum, tražim od Shuffle Casino da potvrdi:
Njihov sistem je dozvoljavao ponovljene nove naloge
Više puta su primali depozite iz istog novčanika
Nisu me blokirali niti ograničavali uprkos ogromnim gubicima
Dozvolili su nastavak kockanja čak i nakon što je ovaj spor podnet sa istim kripto novčanicima kao i ranije, a ja sam poslao dokaze za to.
I da se vrati iznos uplaćen tokom perioda kada su odgovorno igranje i zaštita od višestrukih naloga očigledno zakazale.
6. Spreman sam da pružim ID-ove transakcija koji pokazuju da je isti novčanik korišćen na svakom pojedinačnom nalogu.
Ovo nesumnjivo dokazuje da je Shuffle Casino dozvolio istoj osobi da više puta uplaćuje hiljade na nove naloge.
Hello CasinoGuru team,
Thank you for continuing to look into this. I would like to respond to Shuffle Casino’s latest message, because several of their statements are not accurate and do not address the core issue.
1. Their entire defense is that I did not upload my ID on the other accounts.
That is exactly the problem. I opened 10+ accounts, all using:
The same device
The same IP/location
The same crypto wallet addresses (SOL, LTC, AVAX, XRP)
The same withdrawal wallet
The same phone number or variations of my number
Same address, and wallet addresses
Same names
Same city, address
Despite all of this, and despite the fact that they claim to have "internal measures," I was still able to deposit over $22,000 in a few weeks, including $4,000 just today alone, all after the complaint was already being reviewed. They are all from the same Solana an AVAX addresses and ltc.
If their internal systems were functioning, I should not have been allowed to make any further deposits on any account — especially not after losing this much.
2. Their claim of "bad faith" is unfair and incorrect.
If I intended to hide or commit fraud, I would not keep using the exact same blockchain wallet repeatedly on every account.
Crypto transactions are transparent — they can clearly see they all come from the same source.
No fraudulent gambler uses the same wallet 10+ times.
The reality is simple:
Their system allowed it.
They accepted every deposit without question.
This is a responsible-gaming and KYC failure on the casino’s side, not mine.
3. I was not trying to claim unassociated losses — I am trying to show a pattern of irresponsible acceptance of deposits.
Every deposit — whether on account 1 or account 10 — came from the same person, the same wallet, the same device, which they could easily verify.
They should not be accepting unlimited deposits from unverified accounts after seeing so many repeat signups from the same source.
4. The casino ignored the question asked by CasinoGuru.
CasinoGuru asked Shuffle Casino:
"What measures did you take to stop this from happening?"
Shuffle’s response did not answer that.
They only claimed they "have internal measures" but won’t disclose them — while at the same time those measures clearly failed, as I continued depositing thousands even today, after their statement.
5. I am NOT asking for all losses. I am asking for accountability for deposits they should never have allowed.
At a minimum, I am asking for Shuffle Casino to acknowledge:
Their system allowed repeated new accounts
They accepted deposits from the same wallet repeatedly
They did not block or restrict me despite massive losses
They allowed continued gambling even after this dispute was filed with the same crypto wallets as before and I’ve sent evidence of that.
And to refund the amounts deposited during periods where responsible-gaming and anti-multi-account protection clearly failed.
6. I am willing to provide transaction IDs showing the same wallet was used on every single account.
This proves undisputedly that Shuffle Casino allowed the same person to deposit thousands repeatedly across new accounts.
Izmenjeno
Automatski prevedeno: