Dragi Romi i SlotNeo timu,
Hvala vam na odgovoru. Međutim, vaše objašnjenje pokreće nekoliko ozbiljnih nedoumica.
Prvo, vaše obrazloženje je nedosledno. U početku je moj nalog zatvoren zbog neslaganja u datumu rođenja tokom provere ličnosti (KYC). Sada su uvedeni dodatni razlozi kao što su „zloupotrebni obrasci klađenja" i „dupli nalozi". Ovo stvara utisak da se razlozi dodaju retrospektivno kako bi se opravdala odluka, umesto da budu stvarni uzrok.
Što se tiče pitanja datuma rođenja:
Nikada nisam namerno dao netačne informacije. Netačan datum je bio rezultat očiglednog tehničkog problema na vašem veb-sajtu, što sam demonstrirao na videu. Još važnije, odmah sam kontaktirao ćaskanje uživo i zatražio ispravku u roku od nekoliko minuta. Ovo jasno dokazuje da nije bilo namere da se obmane.
Najvažnije:
Nisam imao nikakvu korist od ove neslaganosti. Moji lični dokumenti sadrže moj stvarni i tačan datum rođenja, koji sam podneo tokom KYC-a. Ne bi imalo logičkog smisla podneti ispravna dokumenta, a istovremeno namerno navesti netačne podatke.
U vezi sa navodnim „zloupotrebnim obrascima klađenja":
Niste naveli nijedan konkretan primer šta je tačno bilo zloupotreba. Sva moja igra je odvijana u okviru normalnih parametara i u potpunosti sam se pridržavao uslova bonusa. Opšte izjave bez dokaza ne mogu opravdati konfiskaciju dobitaka.
Što se tiče „dupliranog naloga":
Drugi nalog je očigledno kreiran samo da bi se demonstrirao tehnički problem na vašoj platformi. Nije korišćen za igranje, depozite ili sticanje bilo kakve prednosti. Tretiranje ovoga kao kršenja koje dovodi do konfiskacije dobitaka je nesrazmerno i ignoriše stvarni kontekst.
Štaviše, umesto da prizna jasnu sistemsku manu koju je igrač pokazao, kazino je odlučio da je iskoristi kao dodatni argument protiv mene. Ovaj pristup je veoma sumnjiv.
Ukratko:
Nije došlo do namernog pogrešnog predstavljanja
Nije stečena nikakva prednost
Nisu dati konkretni dokazi o zloupotrebi klađenja
Duplikat naloga nije imao uticaja na igru ili dobitke
Ljubazno molim kazino da jasno objasni:
Koju sam tačno prednost stekao od bilo čega od navedenog?
Bez dokazivanja opipljive prednosti ili kršenja pravila koje utiče na pravičnost igre, konfiskacija dobitaka je neopravdana.
Pored toga , želeo bih da pružim video dokaz koji jasno pokazuje problem sa poljem za datum rođenja na vašoj veb stranici.
Na videu je jasno vidljivo da se datum može nenamerno promeniti jednostavnom interakcijom sa interfejsom kalendara, bez ikakve potvrde. Ovo nije stvar greške korisnika, već jasne sistemske greške.
Svrha kreiranja test naloga bila je isključivo da se dokumentuje i demonstrira ovaj problem, jer ne postoji drugi način da se pokaže kako se on javlja. Test nalog nikada nije korišćen za igranje, depozite ili sticanje bilo kakve prednosti.
Štaviše, imam imejl komunikaciju od vašeg tima za podršku koja potvrđuje da je prvobitni razlog za blokiranje mog naloga bilo neslaganje u datumu rođenja. U to vreme nije bilo pomena o „zloupotrebnim obrascima klađenja" ili „dupliranim nalozima".
Uvođenje novih razloga tek u ovoj fazi izaziva ozbiljne zabrinutosti u vezi sa doslednošću i validnošću vaše odluke.
Još jednom bih želeo da naglasim da:
Nisam imao nikakvu korist od ovog problema
Odmah sam prijavio problem
Dostavio/la sam tačna lična dokumenta
Umesto da prizna jasnu tehničku grešku, kazino je sada koristi kao argument protiv igrača, što je veoma sumnjivo.
Molimo vas da video dokaz pronađete ovde:
Na kraju , želeo bih da istaknem jednu značajnu neslaganje.
U originalnoj komunikaciji vašeg tima za podršku, kao i u vašem odgovoru na Trustpilot-u, razlog za blokiranje mog naloga je jasno naveden kao neslaganje u datumu rođenja. Ni u jednom trenutku nisu pomenuti „zloupotrebni obrasci klađenja" ili „dupli nalozi".
Tek sada, tokom ovog postupka žalbe, uvode se dodatni razlozi. Ovo izaziva ozbiljnu zabrinutost u vezi sa doslednošću i kredibilitetom stava kazina.
Već godinama se bavim kockanjem na mreži i moram priznati da je veoma neuobičajeno videti nove optužbe u kasnijoj fazi, posebno kada je prvobitni razlog bio jasno definisan.
Još više zabrinjava to što sam demonstrirao jasan tehnički problem na vašoj platformi, sa namerom da objasnim i pomognem u identifikaciji problema. Umesto da to prizna, kazino to sada koristi kao dodatni argument protiv mene.
Ovakav pristup pokreće ozbiljna pitanja o pravičnosti i integritetu postupaka kazina u ovom slučaju.
https://imgur.com/a/pO2ymeX
Dear Romi and SlotNeo Team,
Thank you for your response. However, your explanation raises several serious concerns.
First, your justification is inconsistent. Initially, my account was closed due to a Date of Birth discrepancy during KYC. Now, additional reasons such as "abusive betting patterns" and "duplicate accounts" have been introduced. This creates the impression that reasons are being added retrospectively to justify the decision, rather than being the actual cause.
Regarding the Date of Birth issue:
I never intentionally provided incorrect information. The incorrect date was the result of a clear technical issue on your website, which I have demonstrated on video. More importantly, I immediately contacted live chat and requested correction within minutes. This clearly proves there was no intent to mislead.
Most importantly:
I did not gain any advantage from this discrepancy. My identity documents contain my real and correct date of birth, which I submitted during KYC. It would make no logical sense to submit correct documents and at the same time intentionally provide incorrect data.
Regarding the alleged "abusive betting patterns":
You have not provided a single concrete example of what exactly was abusive. All my gameplay was conducted within normal parameters, and I fully complied with the bonus terms. General statements without evidence cannot justify confiscation of winnings.
Regarding the "duplicate account":
The second account was clearly created only to demonstrate a technical issue on your platform. It was not used for gameplay, deposits, or gaining any advantage. Treating this as a violation leading to confiscation of winnings is disproportionate and ignores the actual context.
Furthermore, instead of acknowledging a clear system flaw demonstrated by the player, the casino chose to use it as an additional argument against me. This approach is highly questionable.
In summary:
No intentional misrepresentation occurred
No advantage was gained
No concrete evidence of abusive betting was provided
The duplicate account had no impact on gameplay or winnings
I kindly ask the casino to clearly explain:
What exact advantage did I gain from any of the above?
Without demonstrating a tangible advantage or rule violation affecting gameplay fairness, the confiscation of winnings is unjustified.
Additionally, I would like to provide video evidence clearly demonstrating the issue with the Date of Birth field on your website.
In the video, it is clearly visible that the date can be unintentionally changed simply by interacting with the calendar interface, without any confirmation. This is not a matter of user error, but a clear system flaw.
The purpose of creating the test account was solely to document and demonstrate this issue, as there is no other way to show how it occurs. The test account was never used for gameplay, deposits, or gaining any advantage.
Furthermore, I have email communication from your support team confirming that the original reason for blocking my account was the Date of Birth discrepancy. No mention of "abusive betting patterns" or "duplicate accounts" was made at that time.
Introducing new reasons only at this stage raises serious concerns about the consistency and validity of your decision.
Once again, I would like to emphasize that:
I did not gain any advantage from this issue
I reported the problem immediately
I provided accurate identity documents
Instead of acknowledging a clear technical flaw, the casino is now using it as an argument against the player, which is highly questionable.
Please find the video evidence here:
Finally, I would like to highlight a significant inconsistency.
In the original communication from your support team, as well as in your response on Trustpilot, the reason for blocking my account was clearly stated as the Date of Birth discrepancy. At no point were "abusive betting patterns" or "duplicate accounts" mentioned.
Only now, during this complaint process, additional reasons are being introduced. This raises serious concerns about the consistency and credibility of the casino’s position.
I have been involved in online gambling for many years, and I must admit that it is highly unusual to see new accusations appear at a later stage, especially when the original reason was clearly defined.
What is even more concerning is that I demonstrated a clear technical issue on your platform, with the intention of explaining and helping to identify the problem. Instead of acknowledging this, the casino is now using it as an additional argument against me.
This approach raises serious questions about the fairness and integrity of the casino’s actions in this case.
https://imgur.com/a/pO2ymeX
Automatski prevedeno: