Zdravo Veronika,
Želeo bih da pružim važne informacije u vezi sa mojim slučajem i najnovijim odgovorom od strane Stake-a.
Stejk je sada pojasnio da je moj nalog i dalje ograničen zbog nedovoljne verifikacije za oba:
Nivo 3 (Dokaz o adresi)
Nivo 4 (Izvor sredstava)
Za nivo 3,
Izjavili su da dokumenti na ime mog oca i overena izjava pod zakletvom nisu dovoljni, jer zahtevaju nezavisno proverljiv dokument izdat na moje ime. Kao odgovor na to, obavestio sam ih da ću dobiti bankarsko preporučno pismo od moje banke na moje ime (uključujući moju punu adresu) i da ću ga podneti čim bude izdato.
Za nivo 4 (Izvor sredstava),
Stejk je napomenuo da do sada dostavljena dokumenta (prvenstveno izvodi iz banke mog oca) ne uspostavljaju jasnu vezu između mene i sredstava korišćenih na računu.
Da bih se pozabavio ovim problemom, sada sam im pružio detaljno pojašnjenje u kojem objašnjavam stvarno poreklo i tok mojih sredstava.
Konkretno, objasnio sam da:
Sredstva potiču od mojih ličnih onlajn aktivnosti, prvenstveno od trgovanja na Polymarket-u , gde sam učestvovao na tržištima predviđanja i ostvarivao profit kroz pozicije kupovine/prodaje.
Takođe sam imao dodatnu zaradu od onlajn platformi kao što je Roblox (digitalne/aktivnosti vezane za igre)
Sva sredstva su prebačena preko mog ličnog ne-kustodialnog novčanika na Polygon mreži.
Nisu primljena niti pomešana sredstva treće strane
Sva ponovljena uplata i isplata bila su posledica normalnog korišćenja platforme, gde su prethodno povučena sredstva ponovo korišćena
Takođe sam obavestio Stejka da sam u potpunosti u mogućnosti da obezbedim:
Adresa mog novčanika
Kompletna istorija transakcija (preko Polygonscan-a)
Hešovi transakcija
Snimci ekrana moje aktivnosti u Polimarketu
Uprkos mojoj punoj saradnji i detaljnom objašnjenju, čini se da problem ostaje da njihov sistem ili proces ne uzima u obzir pravilno kombinovane ili alternativne dokaze i da se možda i dalje u velikoj meri oslanja na stroge formate dokumenata.
U ovoj fazi, ljubazno bih zamolio/la vašu pomoć u sledećem:
Da bih se osigurao da moj slučaj ručno pregleda tim za usklađenost kompanije Stake, uzimajući u obzir oba:
Moja stvarna situacija kao studenta koji živi sa roditeljima
Alternativni, ali legitiman dokaz koji sam pružio
Da bih vam savetovao da li moje objašnjenje i dokaz o sredstvima zasnovan na blokčejnu (Polimarket + istorija novčanika) treba razumno smatrati prihvatljivim u skladu sa standardnim praksama verifikacije
Želeo bih da naglasim da:
Postupio/la sam u potpunoj dobroj veri
Sva sredstva su legitimna, u ličnom vlasništvu i potpuno se mogu pratiti
U potpunosti sam spreman da pružim sve potrebne dodatne dokaze
Zaista cenim vaše vreme i podršku u razmatranju mog slučaja i pomaganju u rešavanju ove situacije.
Srdačan pozdrav,
Abhinav C***
Hello Veronika,
I would like to provide an important update regarding my case and the latest response from Stake.
Stake has now clarified that my account remains restricted due to insufficient verification for both:
Level 3 (Proof of Address)
Level 4 (Source of Funds)
For Level 3,
they stated that documents in my father’s name and the notarized affidavit are not sufficient, as they require an independently verifiable document issued in my own name. In response to this, I have informed them that I will be obtaining a Bank Reference Letter from my bank in my own name (including my full address) and will submit it as soon as it is issued.
For Level 4 (Source of Funds),
Stake mentioned that the documents provided so far (primarily my father’s bank statements) do not establish a clear link between me and the funds used on the account.
To address this, I have now provided them with a detailed clarification explaining the actual origin and flow of my funds.
Specifically, I explained that:
The funds originate from my personal online activities, primarily from trading on Polymarket, where I participated in prediction markets and generated profits through buy/sell positions
I also had additional earnings from online platforms such as Roblox (digital/game-related activities)
All funds were transferred through my personal non-custodial wallet on the Polygon network
No third-party funds were received or mixed
Any repeated deposits and withdrawals were due to normal platform usage, where previously withdrawn funds were reused
I also informed Stake that I am fully able to provide:
My wallet address
Full transaction history (via Polygonscan)
Transaction hashes
Screenshots of my Polymarket activity
Despite my full cooperation and detailed explanation, the issue seems to remain that their system or process is not properly considering combined or alternative proof, and may still be relying heavily on strict document formats.
At this stage, I would kindly request your assistance in the following:
To help ensure that my case is reviewed manually by Stake’s compliance team, considering both:
My real-life situation as a student living with parents
The alternative but legitimate proof I have provided
To advise whether my explanation and blockchain-based proof of funds (Polymarket + wallet history) should reasonably be considered acceptable under standard verification practices
I would like to emphasize that:
I have acted in full good faith
All funds are legitimate, personally owned, and fully traceable
I am fully willing to provide any additional proof required
I truly appreciate your time and support in reviewing my case and helping mediate this situation.
Kind regards,
Abhinav C***
Izmenjeno od strane Casino Guru administratora
Automatski prevedeno: