Dragi Kubo,
Hvala vam još jednom na vremenu i podršci tokom ovog pitanja.
Potvrđujem da je iznos od 200 evra uspešno povučen i da je moj račun zatvoren kako je zahtevano.
Međutim, želeo bih formalno da nastavim postupak povraćaja 570 evra koji su uplaćeni nakon mog zahteva za samoisključenje, koji sam podneo putem e-pošte 02.08.2025. godine, eksplicitno navodeći zavisnost od kockanja kao razlog.
Uprkos stavu kazina, moram s poštovanjem naglasiti sledeće:
Moj zahtev za samoisključenje je poslat putem imejla, što je zvanični kanal, i jasno sam se pozivao na problem sa kockanjem.
Prema većini regulatornih standarda (uključujući smernice EU o zaštiti potrošača), od operatera se očekuje da reaguju na zahteve za samoisključenje bez nepotrebnog odlaganja, posebno kada je poruka jasna i odnosi se na odgovorno kockanje.
Svih 570 evra depozita je izvršeno nakon slanja ove e-pošte. Ove transakcije su tehnički trebalo da budu blokirane da je samoisključenje obrađeno odgovorno i blagovremeno.
Bez obzira na bilo kakvo interno kašnjenje u obradi, sredstva su primljena i prihvaćena nakon što je operater bio obavešten.
Već sam podneo/la:
Kompletna dokumentacija vremenskog okvira i dokaz o depozitima,
Zvanične žalbe mojim bankama,
Žalba finansijskim vlastima i kanalima za zaštitu potrošača Kostarike.
Sada molim da ova žalba ostane otvorena i da se pozove kazino da ponovo razmotri ovaj povraćaj novca, jer odgovornost za sprečavanje pristupa platformi nakon zahteva za isključenje leži na operateru, a ne na igraču — posebno kada se proglasi zavisnost.
Hvala vam još jednom na kontinuiranoj pomoći.
Ostajem na raspolaganju da dostavim svu potrebnu dodatnu dokumentaciju.
Srdačan pozdrav,
[uređeno od strane Casino Guru]
Dear Kubo,
Thank you again for your time and support throughout this matter.
I confirm that the €200 balance has been successfully withdrawn, and my account has been closed as requested.
However, I would like to formally continue pursuing the refund of the €570 that were deposited after my self-exclusion request, which I submitted via email on 02/08/2025, explicitly stating gambling addiction as the reason.
Despite the casino’s position, I must respectfully emphasize the following:
My request for self-exclusion was sent via email, which is the official channel, and I clearly referred to a gambling problem.
According to most regulatory standards (including EU consumer protection guidelines), operators are expected to act on self-exclusion requests without undue delay, especially when the message is clear and relates to responsible gambling.
All of the €570 in deposits were made after this email was sent. These transactions should have been technically blocked had the self-exclusion been handled responsibly and in a timely manner.
Regardless of any internal processing delay, the funds were received and accepted after the operator was on notice.
I have already submitted:
Full documentation of the timeline and proof of deposits,
Formal complaints to my banks,
A complaint to Costa Rica’s financial authority and consumer protection channels.
I now ask that this complaint remain open and that the casino be urged to reconsider this refund, as the responsibility to prevent access to the platform after an exclusion request lies with the operator, not the player — especially when addiction is declared.
Thank you again for your continued assistance.
I remain available to provide any additional documentation needed.
Best regards,
[redacted by Casino Guru]
Izmenjeno od strane Casino Guru administratora
Automatski prevedeno: