Pre nekog vremena sam izgubio pristup svom starom nalogu i obratio se timu za usklađenost za pomoć. Odgovorili su mi i savetovali da otvorim novi nalog koristeći drugu adresu e-pošte.
Pre dva dana sam otvorio novi nalog i sve je funkcionisalo normalno. Čak sam mogao da podižem i manje iznose bez ikakvih problema. Međutim, danas kada sam pokušao da podignem 400 dolara, moj račun je iznenada blokiran. Ukupno je oduzeto 500 dolara - 400 dolara od podignutog iznosa i preostalih 100 dolara na mom stanju.
Tokom dana sam izvršio osam odvojenih depozita, koji su svi ručno odobreni i kreditirani od strane vaših agenata za podršku. Ni u jednom trenutku nisam bio upozoren na bilo kakve potencijalne probleme ili prekršaje. Čak i da je došlo do neke vrste kršenja (za šta čvrsto verujem da nije bilo), trebalo je da budem obavešten tokom procesa depozita — posebno zato što je svaku transakciju vaš tim pregledao i odobravao u realnom vremenu.
Pokušao/la sam da kontaktiram podršku putem ćaskanja uživo, podelio/la sam sve relevantne detalje, ali mi nije ponuđena nikakva pomoć. Sada, kada šaljem poruke, osoblje za podršku se pojavljuje onlajn, ali me ignoriše. Jedino objašnjenje koje sam dobio/la za radnju na nalogu bilo je nejasno pominjanje „Pravila 3.2", bez daljih pojašnjenja.
Jedini mogući razlog koji mi pada na pamet za ovu akciju je taj što sam juče preporučio svojoj ženi da se pridruži TrustDice-u nakon što je videla referalni link i odlučila da pokuša. Registrovala se i igrala kratko, ali nije zahtevala niti koristila nikakve bonuse – nešto što je, koliko razumem, obično glavni razlog za takva ograničenja. Nije bilo finansijske dobiti, zloupotrebe niti namere da se zaobiđe sistem.
Više smo nego voljni da pružimo naše lične karte i dokaz o adresi kako bismo potvrdili da smo dve odvojene osobe. Moja supruga i ja takođe imamo odvojene naloge na nekoliko renomiranih onlajn kazina, koji nemaju problem sa dve osobe iz istog domaćinstva koje igraju nezavisno. Ovo je uobičajena praksa u celoj industriji i ne nešto što se generalno smatra kršenjem.
Razumem da vaši uslovi korišćenja mogu ograničavati više naloga iz istog domaćinstva, ali kao igrači, nije uvek izvodljivo pročitati svaku klauzulu — posebno kada nije korišćen bonus i nije iskorišćena nepravedna prednost. Ako se ova situacija smatra kršenjem, iskreno se nadam da se može posmatrati kao stvarni propust, a ne kao namerno kršenje.
Ponovo sam kontaktirao tim za usklađenost i s poštovanjem molim za pravedan pregled ovog pitanja. Postupio sam u dobroj veri i smatram da je nepravedno konfiskovati 500 dolara sa mog računa pod ovim okolnostima.
Pored toga, želim da istaknem da se trenutno nalazim u finansijski ranjivoj poziciji i da je iznos od 500 dolara značajan za mene. Njegova konfiskacija bez blagovremenog upozorenja mi je prouzrokovala značajnu patnju. Postupio sam u dobroj veri i nadam se da će se ovo pitanje preispitati i pravedno rešiti.
I lost access to my old account some time ago and reached out to the compliance team for assistance. They responded and advised me to open a new account using a different email address.
I created a new account two days ago, and everything was functioning normally. I was even able to make small withdrawals without any issues. However, today when I attempted to withdraw $400, my account was suddenly blocked. In total, $500 was confiscated—$400 from the withdrawal and the remaining $100 in my balance.
Throughout the day, I made eight separate deposits, all of which were manually approved and credited by your support agents. At no point was I warned of any potential issues or violations. Even if there was some kind of breach (which I strongly believe there wasn’t), I should have been notified during the deposit process—especially since each transaction was reviewed and approved in real time by your team.
I tried reaching out to live chat support, shared all the relevant details, but was not offered any help. Now, when I send messages, support staff appear online but ignore me. The only explanation I was given for the account action was a vague reference to "Rule 3.2," with no further clarification.
The only possible reason I can think of for this action is that I referred my wife to join TrustDice yesterday after seeing the referral link and deciding to give it a try. She registered and played briefly, but did not claim or use any bonuses—something I understand is usually the main reason for such restrictions. There was no financial gain, no abuse, and no intent to bypass the system.
We are more than willing to provide our IDs and proof of address to verify that we are two separate individuals. My wife and I also have separate accounts on several reputable online casinos, which have no issue with two individuals from the same household playing independently. This is a common practice across the industry and not something that is generally considered a violation.
I understand that your terms and conditions may restrict multiple accounts from the same household, but as players, it's not always feasible to read through every clause—especially when no bonus was used, and no unfair advantage was taken. If this situation is being seen as a violation, I sincerely hope it can be viewed as a genuine oversight rather than an intentional breach.
I’ve contacted the compliance team again and respectfully request a fair review of this matter. I have acted in good faith and believe it is unjust to confiscate the $500 in my account under these circumstances.
Additionally, I want to highlight that I am currently in a financially vulnerable position, and the $500 balance is a significant amount for me. Having it confiscated without a fair warning has caused me considerable distress. I have acted in good faith and hope that this matter can be reviewed and resolved fairly.
Automatski prevedeno: