Wildz je odgovorio: Da bismo pružili kontekst, Wildz kazino je počeo da radi pod novom licencom koju je izdala Malteška uprava za igre na sreću (broj licence MGA/B2C/1079/2025) sa snagom od 20. novembra 2025. godine - ovo je objašnjeno u imejlu koji vam je poslat 10. marta 2026. godine.
Pošto je vaš Wildz nalog kreiran nakon ove tranzicije, on je uspostavljen u okviru novog okvira licenciranja. Kao rezultat toga, sva ograničenja postavljena prethodnom licencom nisu automatski preneta na ovaj novi nalog.
Međutim, nakon vaših povratnih informacija, ručno smo primenili vaše prethodno ograničenje na vaš Wildz nalog. Ubuduće će ovo ograničenje ostati aktivno za sve trenutne i buduće brendove - kao što je Blingi, koji posluju pod ovom licencom, osim ako ne odlučite da je izmenite.
Međutim, upravo mi je to teško da razumem. Na drugim sestrinskim sajtovima unutar iste grupe, takođe sam morao da napravim nove naloge, ali je isti grupni/zajednički limit i dalje bio aktivan tamo. Nisam ručno ponovo podesio limit na tim sajtovima, ali je on ostao na snazi.
Iz tog razloga, objašnjenje mi i dalje deluje nedosledno. Ako je prenos licence i kreiranje novog naloga bio pravi razlog, onda ne razumem zašto je ovaj problem uticao samo na Wildz, dok je isto ograničenje nastavilo da funkcioniše na mojim drugim sestrinskim sajtovima.
Po mom mišljenju, ovo ukazuje na to da problem nije bio samo u samoj promeni licence, već da zajedničko/grupno ograničenje nije pravilno primenjeno posebno na Wildz. Uprkos tome što je to priznao i ručno ispravio ograničenje naknadno, operater je i dalje odbio bilo kakav povraćaj novca ili nadoknadu.
Wildz replied:To provide some context, Wildz Casino began operating under the new license issued by the Malta Gaming Authority (License No. MGA/B2C/1079/2025) effective November 20, 2025 - this was explained within the email sent to you on March 10th 2026.
Because your Wildz account was created after this transition, it was established under the new licensing framework. As a result, any limits set under the previous license did not automatically carry over to this new account.
However, following your feedback, we have then manually applied your previous limit to your Wildz account. Moving forward, this limit will remain active across all current and future brands - such as Blingi, operating under this license unless you choose to amend it.
However, this is exactly what I find difficult to understand. On other sister sites within the same group, I also had to create new accounts, but the same group/common limit was still active there. I did not manually set the limit again on those sites, yet it remained in effect.
For that reason, the explanation still seems inconsistent to me. If the licence transition and new account creation were the real reason, then I do not understand why this issue affected Wildz only, while the same limit continued to function on my other sister sites.
In my view, this suggests that the problem was not simply the licence transition itself, but that the common/group limit was not correctly applied specifically to Wildz. Despite acknowledging this and manually correcting the limit afterwards, the operator still refused any refund or compensation.
Automatski prevedeno: