Zdravo svima,
Nakon pažljivog pregleda svih informacija i dokaza koje su obe strane dostavile, uključujući istoriju bonusa, snimke toka aktivacije, odlomke iz ćaskanja sa podrškom i dodatne materijale koje je kazino dostavio putem e-pošte, došao sam do konačnog zaključka u vezi sa ovim slučajem.
Na osnovu raspoloživih dokaza, smatram da je kazino dovoljno dokazao da sporni bonus na drugi depozit nije primenjen automatski, već je zahtevao aktivan izbor igrača tokom procesa depozita. Dostavljeni snimci jasno pokazuju da je igrač imao mogućnost da aktivira ili odbije bonus pre nego što je završio depozit.
Pored toga, razgovor sa podrškom koji je kazino podelio ukazuje na to da je igrač bio svestan postojanja bonusa i da je posebno razgovarao o maksimalnom ograničenju dobitka povezanom sa njim. Zapisi koje je kazino pružio su takođe dosledni u pogledu vremenske oznake aktivacije, završetka klađenja i naknadne primene ograničenja maksimalne isplate u skladu sa uslovima bonusa.
Iako razumem frustraciju igrača ishodom, nisam dobio dovoljno dokaza koji bi dokazali da je bonus aktiviran bez njegovog pristanka ili da ga je sistem pogrešno primenio.
Iz ovih razloga, ne mogu zaključiti da je kazino postupio nepravedno u ovom slučaju.
Kao rezultat toga, ova žalba će sada biti odbačena.
Hvala vam obojici na saradnji tokom cele istrage.
Srdačan pozdrav,
Samuel
Kazino Guru
Hello everyone,
after carefully reviewing all the information and evidence provided by both sides, including the bonus history, activation flow recordings, support chat excerpts, and the additional materials submitted by the casino via email, I have reached my final conclusion regarding this case.
Based on the available evidence, I find that the casino has sufficiently demonstrated that the disputed second deposit bonus was not applied automatically, but required an active selection by the player during the deposit process. The provided recordings clearly show that the player had the option to either activate or decline the bonus before completing the deposit.
Additionally, the support chat shared by the casino indicates that the player was aware of the existence of the bonus and specifically discussed the maximum win limitation connected to it. The records provided by the casino are also consistent regarding the activation timestamp, wagering completion, and subsequent application of the maximum payout cap according to the bonus terms.
While I understand the player’s frustration with the outcome, I was not provided with sufficient evidence proving that the bonus was activated without consent or incorrectly applied by the system.
For these reasons, I am unable to conclude that the casino acted unfairly in this case.
As a result, this complaint will now be rejected.
Thank you both for your cooperation throughout the investigation.
Best regards,
Samuel
Casino Guru
Automatski prevedeno: