Samo da razjasnim nešto što ste pomenuli: da, razgovarao sam sa stručnjakom, ali ne sa bilo kojim slučajnim posmatračem. On je neko sa obrazovanjem iz fizike i preko 40 godina iskustva sa ruletom, dobro poznat u određenim profesionalnim krugovima i sa značajnim brojem sledbenika.
Iz profesionalnih razloga, ne mogu da otkrijem njegov identitet, jer ima veze sa nekim dobavljačima igara i posebno me je zamolio da javno ne pominjem njegovo ime ili akreditive. Nadam se da to razumete.
Njegova analiza nije bila zasnovana na pretpostavkama, već na tehničkim aspektima jasno vidljivim u videu koji sam podelio, a neka od njegovih zapažanja je kasnije indirektno potvrdio i sam provajder. Zato bih radije vodio ovu diskusiju sa poštovanjem i izbegavao pretpostavke o tome šta je rečeno ili nije rečeno.
Just to clarify something you mentioned: yes, I did speak with an expert , but not just any casual observer. He is someone with a background in physics and over 40 years of experience with roulette, well known in certain professional circles and with a significant following.
For professional reasons, I can’t disclose his identity, as he has connections with some game providers and specifically asked me not to mention his name or credentials publicly. I hope you can understand that.
His analysis was not based on guesses, but on technical aspects clearly visible in the video I shared , and some of his observations were later indirectly confirmed by the provider themselves. So I’d prefer to keep this discussion respectful and avoid assumptions about what was said or not said.




