Mislim da je sve objašnjeno u žalbi: „ Prema raspoloživim dokazima, podneli ste zahtev za samoisključenje 17. jula, a kazino je zatvorio vaš nalog 20. jula. Imajte u vidu da se u većini kazina zahtevi za samoisključenje obrađuju ručno od strane nadležnih odeljenja. Ovaj proces zahteva izvesno vreme kako bi se osiguralo da se zahtevi obrađuju na odgovarajući način i sa potrebnom pažnjom."
Iz naše perspektive, CrownPlay Casino je reagovao brzo i ograničio pristup vašem nalogu u razumnom roku. Stoga, kazino ne može biti odgovoran za depozite koje ste izvršili tokom perioda obrade zahteva.
Nema se šta više reći, skoro nijedan kazino neće zatvoriti vaš nalog čim ga zamolite. Tri dana su u redu po našem mišljenju, a koliko sam pročitao, kazino je želeo potvrdu da treba da zatvore vaš nalog, što Veronika kaže da nije mogla da pronađe u vašim dokazima.
Verovatno nema ništa više da se doda.
I think everything was explained in the complaint: "According to the available evidence, you submitted your self-exclusion request on 17 July, and the casino closed your account on 20 July. Please note that, in most casinos, self-exclusion requests are handled manually by the responsible departments. This process requires some time to ensure requests are handled appropriately and with the necessary attention.
From our perspective, CrownPlay Casino acted promptly and restricted your account access within a reasonable timeframe. Therefore, the casino cannot be held responsible for the deposits you made during the request-processing period."
There's not much else to say, almost no casino will close your account as soon as you ask them to. Three days is fine in our opinion, and from what I've read, the casino wanted confirmation that they should close your account, which Veronika said she couldn't find in your evidence.
There's probably nothing more to add.
Automatski prevedeno: