Mogli biste to sami da uradite, ali pritisak neće biti isti.
Banka je obavezna ako navedete valjan razlog, i tu dolazi advokat.
Mislite da je banci lako da to dokaže, ali kakav dokaz banka ima? Sudija ne gleda da li ste se kladili ili ne, već da li je banka ispravno postupila u odgovoru na vaš zahtev. Ako niste sigurni, obratite se advokatu.
You could do it yourself, but it doesn't have the same pressure.
The bank is obligated if you give a valid reason, and that's where the lawyer comes in.
You think it's easy for the bank to prove that, but what proof does the bank have? A judge doesn't look at whether you placed a bet or not, but rather whether the bank acted correctly in response to your request. If you're unsure, go and ask a lawyer.
Podrías hacerlo tú si , pero no tiene la misma presión .
el banco está obligado si das un motivo válido , y ahí entra el abogado.
tu ves fácil que el banco pueda demostrar eso , pero que pruebas tiene el banco ? Un juez no mira si apostaste o no , sino si el banco actuó correctamente ante tu petición, sino ves y pregunta a un abogado .
Automatski prevedeno: