Poštovani tim za žalbe Casino Guru-a,
Pišem Vam kako bih pružio dodatna pojašnjenja u vezi sa mojom žalbom protiv NineCasino-a.
Prvo, potvrđujem da sam sada primio/la predmetnih 2.000 evra. Međutim, neophodno je razjasniti kako se to dogodilo.
Više od dva i po meseca, moja sredstva su ostala blokirana. Tokom celog ovog perioda, NineCasino me je više puta upućivao da „molim vas sačekate" i uveravao me da se stvar preispituje. Uprkos mojim brojnim praćenjima, činilo se da nikakva konkretna akcija nije preduzeta sa njihove strane.
Na kraju sam lično direktno kontaktirao njihovog provajdera plaćanja. Zanimljivo je da je dan nakon što sam se lično obratio provajderu, 2.000 evra vraćeno.
Ovo jasno pokazuje da su sredstva bila povratljiva i da su mere mogle biti preduzete ranije. Nije bila moja odgovornost da intervenišem kod treće strane koju je kazino ugovorio. Teret rešavanja problema sa plaćanjem sa njihovim sopstvenim dobavljačima usluga trebalo bi u potpunosti da padne na operatera, a ne na igrača.
Kao rezultat ove situacije, patio sam od nekoliko predrasuda:
Imobilizacija od 2.000 evra na više od dva i po meseca;
Suspenzija mog naloga tokom istog perioda;
Ponavljani napori i vreme provedeno u traženju podrške;
Potrebna je lična intervencija da bih povratio svoja sredstva;
Gubitak lutrijskih tiketa i promotivnih mogućnosti tokom suspenzije;
Odbijanje prethodno razmatranog bonusa od 120% (do 1.500 evra);
Nametanje ograničenja depozita od 5.000 evra mesečno bez transparentnog obrazloženja.
Što se tiče ograničenja depozita, NineCasino tvrdi da je to povezano sa internim „problemima sa istorijom naloga", iako:
Moji rezultati procene odgovornog kockanja su u skladu sa propisima;
Ograničenje je nametnuto uprkos mom VIP statusu;
Nije dato jasno ili objektivno objašnjenje.
Takođe odbijaju bilo kakav oblik nadoknade, tvrdeći da su isplate tehnički ostale dostupne tokom suspenzije. Međutim, praktična realnost je da su mi sredstva bila blokirana mesecima i da nisam mogao normalno da koristim svoj račun.
Ukratko, iako je 2.000 evra sada vraćeno, osnovni problemi ostaju:
Prekomerno i neopravdano kašnjenje u rešavanju problema sa plaćanjem;
Nedelanje dok se ja lično nisam intervenisao;
Nedostatak transparentnosti u vezi sa restriktivnim merama;
Odbijanje da se obezbedi bilo kakva srazmerna nadoknada za pretrpljenu štetu.
Stoga tražim vašu pomoć u preispitivanju da li je ponašanje operatera u skladu sa standardima fer kockanja i principima zaštite igrača.
Ostajem na raspolaganju da pružim svu potrebnu prateću dokumentaciju.
Srdačan pozdrav,
Malik Šrajber
Dear Casino Guru Complaints Team,
I am writing to provide additional clarification regarding my complaint against NineCasino
First, I confirm that I have now received the €2,000 in question. However, it is essential to clarify how this occurred.
For more than two and a half months, my funds remained immobilised. During this entire period, NineCasino repeatedly instructed me to "please wait" and assured me that the matter was under review. Despite my numerous follow-ups, no concrete action appeared to be taken on their side.
Ultimately, I personally contacted their payment provider directly. Remarkably, one day after I reached out to the provider myself, the €2,000 was refunded.
This clearly demonstrates that the funds were recoverable and that action could have been taken earlier. It was not my responsibility to intervene with a third-party provider contracted by the casino. The burden of resolving payment issues with their own service providers should fall entirely on the operator, not the player.
As a result of this situation, I suffered several prejudices:
Immobilisation of €2,000 for over two and a half months;
Suspension of my account during that same period;
Repeated efforts and time spent chasing support;
Personal intervention required to recover my own funds;
Loss of lottery tickets and promotional opportunities during suspension;
Refusal of the previously discussed 120% bonus (up to €1,500);
Imposition of a €5,000 monthly deposit limit without transparent justification.
Regarding the deposit limit, NineCasino claims it is related to internal "account history concerns," although:
My responsible gambling assessment results are compliant;
The restriction was imposed despite my VIP status;
No clear or objective explanation has been provided.
They also refuse any form of compensation, arguing that withdrawals remained technically available during suspension. However, the practical reality is that my funds were blocked for months, and I was prevented from normal use of my account.
In summary, although the €2,000 has now been refunded, the underlying issues remain:
Excessive and unjustified delay in resolving a payment issue;
Failure to act until I personally intervened;
Lack of transparency regarding restrictive measures;
Refusal to provide any proportional compensation for the prejudice suffered.
I am therefore requesting your assistance in reviewing whether the operator’s conduct complies with fair gaming standards and player protection principles.
I remain available to provide any supporting documentation if required.
Kind regards,
Mâlik Schreiber
Automatski prevedeno: