Podnosim ovu žalbu u vezi sa Velobetom nakon što je moj nalog zatvoren i približno 1.800 funti dobitaka je konfiskovano pod nejasnim optužbama za „borbu protiv prevare", bez ikakvih jasnih dokaza ili konkretnog objašnjenja.
Važne tačke:
Nisu korišćeni bonusi.
Nije bilo povraćaja sredstava.
Nije došlo do prevarnih aktivnosti plaćanja.
Moji depoziti su prihvaćeni i klađenje je normalno završeno.
Operator nije identifikovao nikakvu konkretnu prevarnu radnju.
Operator je prvobitno pomenuo navodne veze između naloga/veb lokacija, ali su se tokom prepiske objašnjenja više puta menjala.
U jednom trenutku, Velobet je izjavio da posluje kao „nezavisna samostalna veb stranica", dok je istovremeno nastavio da opravdava konfiskaciju dobitaka na osnovu šireg obrazloženja protiv prevare.
Uprkos višestrukim zahtevima, operater nije uspeo da:
identifikovati tačno ponašanje koje je navodno prekršeno,
pružiti dokaze koji podržavaju konfiskaciju,
ili jasno navedite gde Uslovi i odredbe otkrivaju ograničenje na koje se pozivate.
Moja zabrinutost je da se široke klauzule protiv prevare koriste za oduzimanje legitimnih dobitaka bez transparentnog otkrivanja konkretnih pravila koja su navodno prekršena.
Uslovi i odredbe ne otkrivaju jasno da aktivnosti na različitim brendovima/veb lokacijama mogu dovesti do konfiskacije dobitaka.
Zatražio/la sam:
Pojašnjenje tačnog kršenja Uslova.
Dokazi na koje se oslanjalo.
Ponovno razmatranje odluke o konfiskaciji.
Operator je odbio i izjavio da ishod neće biti promenjen, dok je nastavio da navodi samo nejasne reference na „zloupotrebu", „varanje" i „indikatore za borbu protiv prevare".
Mogu da obezbedim:
kompletna e-mail prepiska,
snimci ekrana Uslova i odredbi,
istorija naloga,
i dokaze o oduzetim stanjima.
Tražim pomoć u preispitivanju da li su postupci operatera bili pošteni, transparentni i u skladu sa objavljenim Uslovima i odredbama.
I am submitting this complaint regarding Velobet after my account was closed and approximately £1,800 in winnings were confiscated under vague "anti-fraud" allegations without any clear evidence or specific explanation being provided.
Important points:
No bonuses were used.
No chargebacks occurred.
No fraudulent payment activity occurred.
My deposits were accepted and betting activity was completed normally.
The operator has not identified any specific fraudulent action.
The operator initially referenced alleged links between accounts/websites, but throughout correspondence the explanations changed multiple times.
At one stage, Velobet stated that it operates as an "independent standalone website," while simultaneously continuing to justify confiscation of winnings based on broader anti-fraud reasoning.
Despite repeated requests, the operator has failed to:
identify the exact conduct allegedly breached,
provide evidence supporting the confiscation,
or clearly identify where the Terms & Conditions disclose the restriction relied upon.
My concern is that broad anti-fraud clauses are being used to confiscate legitimate winnings without transparent disclosure of the specific rules allegedly violated.
The Terms & Conditions do not clearly disclose that activity across separate brands/websites could result in confiscation of winnings.
I requested:
Clarification of the exact Terms breach.
Evidence relied upon.
Reconsideration of the confiscation decision.
The operator refused and stated the outcome would not be changed, while continuing to provide only vague references to "misuse," "cheating," and "anti-fraud indicators."
I can provide:
full email correspondence,
screenshots of the Terms & Conditions,
account history,
and evidence of confiscated balances.
I am requesting assistance in reviewing whether the operator’s actions were fair, transparent, and consistent with their published Terms & Conditions.
Automatski prevedeno: