Ne mogu na to da odgovorim sa pravnog stanovišta, ali advokati za igre na sreću bi trebalo da znaju.
Nikada lično nisam istraživao vezu između KIC-a i povraćaja novca. Pravi aspekt je jedino što mi je bitno. Stoga, rekao bih da ste u ozbiljnom nepovoljnom položaju ako kazino nikada nije nameravao da vas verifikuje iz bilo kog razloga. Neće vam biti mnogo prilike da izvadite svoj dobitak.
Međutim, ne bih tražio povraćaj novca ili povraćaj sredstava ako ne možete da položite KIC bez ikakvih problema iz kazina i imate jednaku priliku da igrate kao i svi ostali.
Imajući to u vidu, mislim da banku ne zanimaju posebno pojedinosti kada su u pitanju povraćaji sredstava. Kao rezultat toga, kazina oklevaju da prihvate igrače koji su vratili naplatu preko kazina.
I am not able to respond to that from a legal standpoint, but gaming attorneys ought to know.
I have never personally looked into the connection between KYC and refunds. The fair aspect is the only thing that matters to me. Therefore, I would say you are severely disadvantaged if the casino has never intended to verify you for whatever reason. There will not be much of an opportunity for you to take your winnings out.
However, I would not request a refund or chargeback if you are unable to pass the KYC without any problems from the casino and you have an equal opportunity to play as everyone else.
That being said, I think the bank is not particularly interested in specifics when it comes to chargebacks. As a result, casinos are hesitant to accept players who have charged back across the casinos.
Automatski prevedeno: