pre 8 meseci
Week 6 since I made the first withdrawal request and I still don’t have the money.
Please make not the fault and play in this rip-off Scam Casino guys, please!
Snatch Casino - opšta diskusija (strana 23)
pre 8 meseci
I can see that it has been going on for a long time, I wouldn't want to wait for that either. Once it was an investigation with the game provider, now I read that it is verification. I don't know if I should laugh or cry anymore.
I hope you won't have to wait much longer.
pre 8 meseci
Jednostavno je odvratno šta ovaj prevarantski kazino radi svojim mušterijama.
Sumnjivi prevaranti bez sistema i samo lažu, molim vas, smanjite ocenu ovog lošeg kazina, molim vas..!
40 dana čistih laži i standardnih poruka ili nikakvih odgovora od ovih klovnova u kazinu.
Izmenjeno
Automatski prevedeno:
pre 8 meseci
I apologize for interrupting, but I am quite shocked by how frequently the same pattern occurs. I hope it will all come clearer in the complaint, because as long as complaints and forum posts are still active, players will notice, or at least I hope so!
pre 8 meseci
I think more disgusting is the fact that casino.guru within 3-4 months seeing so much alerts from many customers of this "near to fraud" casino, don't want to reduce the high 8.9 safety index given to them. That's just strange. I will Never trust any safety index Painted here after this.
Izmenjeno
OdgovoriCitiraj2
pre 8 meseci
Yes I wrote already the same two-three times. The reason why they don't do it is a bit strange.
I wait now 7 weeks for fucking 100 Dollar 😀
The approach of this Piss Casino is scamshit, never seen a rip-off tactic like this..
3,5 weeks for 'provider request' (that 100% never happened anyway by nobody, just a tactic to scam) and now 3,5 weeks for KYC (2 Photos, very hard to control in 3-4 weeks or more 😀) .
I'm glad I didn't win more money at this monkey casino. I am sorry for all who won more then 500 or more of thoundands Dollar..
Izmenjeno
OdgovoriCitiraj1
pre 8 meseci
Agree with you 1000%, I’m waiting since 31 March for 7000e withdrawal, 1month for "fair play review" and 20+ days for KYC verifications and i was VIP customer… JOKE of a casino, they should be banned and sent to jail, all of them together with liar supports and useless KYC department!!! ❌❌❌ DON’T PLAY THERE ❌❌❌
OdgovoriCitiraj1
pre 8 meseci
It's 900+. And up to now nothing is paid.
And nothing is said why don't they do.
Izmenjeno
OdgovoriCitiraj1
pre 8 meseci
Agree with you 1000%, I’m waiting since 31 March for 7000e withdrawal, 1month for "fair play review" and 20+ days for KYC verifications and i was VIP customer… JOKE of a casino, they should be banned and sent to jail, all of them together with liar supports and useless KYC department!!! ❌❌❌ DON’T PLAY THERE ❌❌❌
pre 8 meseci
I'm quite sorry about all this, to tell you the truth. These are terrible times to be waiting for money, and I wouldn't want to be in it myself. If I did get it, I would probably never come here again.
I hope this gets sorted out and works out well for everyone. 😥
pre 8 meseci
Morate da snizite ocenu ovog odvratnog, prljavog kazina.
Nije isto kao pre; u stvari, trebalo bi da se smanji na 0 i revalorizuje od datuma kada je stečeno. To NEMA NIKAKVE veze sa starom grupom kazina i ponudama/procesom koji stoji iza nje. Samo ime kazina ostaje.
Molim vas, preduzmite nešto, ove prevarantske svinje moraju biti razotkrivene na internetu i ljudi moraju biti hitno upozoreni na ovu gnusnu prevaru!
Izmenjeno
Automatski prevedeno:
OdgovoriCitiraj1
pre 8 meseci
I think that's exactly what the forum and user reviews and complaints are for. Players know to alert themselves that all may not be well with the casino. We will do what we can according to our usual procedures.
OdgovoriCitiraj1
pre 8 meseci
Looks like your "usual procedures" are usually useless or at least they are too late. Seems you "paint" your ratings for you and for the casinos but never for casino customers.
OdgovoriCitiraj1
pre 8 meseci
I understand that anger and frustration are in place when players wait so long.
Anyway, every case must end so that we can say for sure that the casino made a mistake and did not pay out the player, or made some other fraud. Only then will the safety index change.
If you know how to do it better, so be it, you can make your own page and show us your methods. 🙂
We try to do best for players because without them we won't go far.
So every time we would try to do everything for casinos and favor them, it could backfire.
pre 8 meseci
Ali kazino više NEMA NIKAKVE veze sa starim kazinom Snatch, pa zašto se sve stare recenzije pre aprila jednostavno ne obrišu i objavi nova recenzija od tog trenutka? To je kao novi kazino i samo obmanjuje ljude.
Prevarni kazino može, kao što je već slučaj, jednostavno da napiše ispod svake žalbe svake dve nedelje tokom dve godine: „Trudimo se da ubrzamo vašu isplatu" bla bla bla.
Onda slučaj još uvek nije zatvoren, i niko ne može da donese presudu. Zašto ne postoji ograničenje od jednog meseca? Zato što je sve duže od mesec dana već velika prevara i nema nikakve veze sa normalnim procedurama. Ja i još nekoliko njih čekamo svoj novac već dva prokleta meseca. Da li stvarno mislite da će isplatiti? 😀 I indirektno ga štitite. Ovo nije zamišljeno kao lični napad, ali postupak deluje veoma čudno.
Automatski prevedeno:
OdgovoriCitiraj1
pre 8 meseci
Najmanje što bi trebalo da bude jeste da se istakne da se vlasništvo promenilo i da su se žalbe od tada značajno povećale. I ovo obaveštenje bi zapravo trebalo da bude istaknuto i u svim kazinima u vlasništvu prethodnog vlasnika. Jer je i vlasnik odgovoran za svoje mušterije.
Automatski prevedeno:
OdgovoriCitiraj3
pre 8 meseci
Because these ratings are bought and paid for. The new owners paid to buy the reputation of the original Snatch casino. Thats why they wont change it.
pre 8 meseci
I still hope they don't. Sometimes I also have doubts, but I see the too much positive work they do and try to believe they aren't sold.
Izmenjeno
pre 8 meseci
But the fact is that there are problems with safety indexes. Sure many people agree with that. I guess casino.guru just need a little -to revise the system of giving indexes. It will make people to trust to indexes more.
pre 8 meseci
It is 100% the case. Why do you think askgamblers and casinoguru have different ratings for different casinos? Also notice how casinos with exclusive offers have higher ratings?
pre 8 meseci
Najmanje što bi trebalo da bude jeste da se istakne da se vlasništvo promenilo i da su se žalbe od tada značajno povećale. I ovo obaveštenje bi zapravo trebalo da bude istaknuto i u svim kazinima u vlasništvu prethodnog vlasnika. Jer je i vlasnik odgovoran za svoje mušterije.
Automatski prevedeno:
pre 8 meseci
Actually, a change of ownership does not imply that the staff working in the casino or the rules governing it have changed; these are specifically the factors our Data Team considers when such changes occur. What we see here is the same for other casinos that have switched affiliates. These casinos continue to provide the same low-quality services. Sadly, as I believe someone already mentioned, the Safety Index is based on algorithms and statistical facts. Those facts say it was a poor experience, but the casino (and the others I mentioned) paid out.
That's pretty much it and I, too, would not play at those sites. This is why we keep the user ratings, complaints, and forum discussions in the same location, allowing anyone to compare those sources with the Safety Index before making a decision.
Though I understand that it is common practice to look at just one number... Well, I would personally prefer to lower Safety indexes for certain groups, but for that, my colleagues need unresolved complaints - aka facts. I fully understand that this rating is unsuitable for everyone. My personal advice: Please read all sources, not just one number. 🙏
Dodajte post
