Poštovani esok505,
Učestvovao sam u prilično dugom razgovoru sa kazino timom u vezi sa vašom situacijom i evo mog mišljenja o tome.
Uopšteno govoreći, slažem se sa vama da svako ograničenje kao što je limit depozita, ograničenje gubitka, ograničenje opklade, itd. koje je igrač prethodno aktivirao ne treba ukloniti pre nego što istekne određeno vreme. Naše iskustvo pokazuje da pojedinci koji se suočavaju sa problemima kockanja često smatraju izazovnim da prestanu sa kockanjem kada su suočeni sa značajnim iskušenjem, i imperativ je da kazina sprovode mere da pomognu ovim igračima. Konzistentno podstičemo pojedince da potraže stručnu pomoć ako sumnjaju da su zavisni od kockanja ili se osećaju nesposobnim da efikasno upravljaju svojim impulsima kockanja.
Međutim, nakon pregleda svih relevantnih informacija i dokaza, jasno je da ste svesno i dobrovoljno tražili uklanjanje svojih ograničenja više puta tokom nekoliko dana, a agenti za podršku ćaskanja uživo su ispunili vaš konkretan zahtev, a vi ste naknadno tražili kompenzaciju za gubitke koje ste voljno nastala.
Moram da ponovim da je ključno priznati da igrači takođe moraju preuzeti ličnu odgovornost u ovim situacijama . Alati za samoisključivanje ili alati za odgovorno kockanje imaju za cilj da pomognu igračima da kontrolišu svoj pristup kazino nalozima i smanje rizik od nenamernih finansijskih gubitaka. Ove alate ne bi trebalo da iskoriste igrači koji pokušavaju da iskoriste bilo koju ranjivost i naknadno traže povraćaj izgubljenih sredstava.
Vaša komunikacija putem ćaskanja uživo, našeg foruma i e-pošte nije u skladu sa tipičnim ponašanjem koje pokazuju pojedinci koji se iskreno bore sa problemima kockanja.
Uzimajući u obzir sve ovo, smatram da sam primoran da podržim stav kazina, i bilo bi nepravedno kazniti kazino zato što nije refundirao novac koji ste dobrovoljno i pošteno izgubili, posebno u svetlu činjenice da ste povukli više sredstava nego što ste prvobitno deponovana.
Slobodno se ne slažete sa ovim zaključkom i ako želite dalje da nastavite sa žalbom, možete da podnesete žalbu organu za izdavanje dozvola, ali ja nisam u mogućnosti da vam pružim bilo kakvu pomoć po ovom pitanju.
Potvrdio sam da je Bruno kazino zaista licenciran od strane Komisije za igre na sreću Kahnavake (KGC) u većini zemalja, međutim, u Nemačkoj oni rade pod drugom licencom. Prethodna PAGCOR licenca nije bila namenjena igračima iz Nemačke i već je ispravljena.
Kada pristupite veb stranici kazina iz Nemačke, možete pronaći sledeće:
Uz sve ovo rečeno, vaša žalba će sada biti zatvorena kao odbijena. Žao mi je što nisam mogao više pomoći. Slobodno nas kontaktirajte u budućnosti ako naiđete na bilo kakve probleme sa ovim ili bilo kojim drugim kazinom, a mi ćemo se potruditi da vam pomognemo.
Bio bih vam zahvalan ako me obavestite o odluci organa ako nastavite na ovaj način na " rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank"> michal.k@casino.guru
Srdačan pozdrav,
Michal
Casino Guru
Dear esox505,
I have engaged in quite a lengthy conversation with the casino team regarding your situation and here is my take on it.
In general, I do agree with you that every limit like deposit limit, loss limit, wager limit, etc. a player has previously activated should not be removed before the specific time elapses. Our experience indicates that individuals facing gambling issues often find it challenging to cease gambling when faced with significant temptation, and it is imperative for casinos to implement measures to assist these players. We consistently encourage individuals to seek professional assistance if they suspect they may have a gambling addiction or feel unable to manage their gambling impulses effectively.
However, after reviewing all relevant information and evidence, it is clear that you consciously and voluntarily requested the removal of your limits multiple times over several days, and the live chat support agents fulfilled your specific request, you subsequently sought compensation for the losses you willingly incurred.
I must repeat it is crucial to acknowledge that players must also take personal responsibility in these situations. The self-exclusion tools or responsible gambling tools are intended to help players control their access to casino accounts and reduce the risk of unintentional financial losses. These tools should not be exploited by players attempting to capitalize on any vulnerabilities and subsequently request refunds for lost funds.
Your communications through live chat, our forum, and email do not align with the typical behavior exhibited by individuals genuinely struggling with gambling issues.
Considering all of this, I find myself compelled to support the casino's position, and it would be unjust to penalize the casino for not refunding the money you have willingly and fairly lost, particularly in light of the fact that you have withdrawn more funds than you initially deposited.
You are free to disagree with this conclusion and if you want to pursue your complaint further you can submit a complaint to the licensing authority, but I'm unable to provide any assistance with this matter.
I have it confirmed that Bruno Casino is indeed licensed by the Kahnawake Gaming Commission (KGC) in most countries, however, in Germany they operate under a different license. The previous PAGCOR license was not intended for players from Germany, and it has already been corrected.
When accessing the casino's webpage from Germany the following can be found:
With all this being said, your complaint will now be closed as rejected. I'm sorry I could not be of more help. Please feel free to contact us in the future if you run into any issues with this or any other casino, and we will try our best to help.
I would appreciate it if you inform me of the authority's decision should you pursue this course of action at michal.k@casino.guru
Best regards,
Michal
Casino Guru
Automatski prevedeno: