Znate, na osnovu najnovijeg ažuriranja, mislim da je vredno čekati odgovor kazina:
„Razumem vašu poentu, Sandidock. Sada predlažem da pitate kazino da li je dokument koji ste dali dovoljan da biste završili verifikaciju.
Dragi Heibets kazino,
Možete li potvrditi da li sada možete da verifikujete igrača?"
Jednostavno zato što nadležni organ za izdavanje dozvola na Kurasaou obično ne stupa na način na koji možemo. Osim toga, zamislite da bi proces počeo iz početka; na sva pitanja bi trebalo ponovo odgovoriti, a predstavnici kazina bi morali da se usredsrede na obe žalbe.
Pored toga, mogu li da znam gde ste pronašli kazino koji je licenciran? Koliko vidim, nema licence. Pogledaj .
A validatoru nedostaje zelena gusta, verovatno zato što nije aktivan.
" Da biste proverili da li je licenca za Gaming Curacao (365/JAZ) važeća , najlakši način je da kliknete na validator na veb lokaciji. Ovo će se obično pojaviti kao mali logotip na koji se može kliknuti"
Nažalost, to se ne može učiniti:
You know, based on the latest update, I think it is worth waiting for the casino's reply:
"I understand your point, sandydock. I now suggest asking the casino if the document you provided is sufficient in order to complete the verification.
Dear Heybets Casino,
Can you please confirm if you are now able to verify the player?"
Simply because the Curacao licensing authority usually does not step in the way we can. Aside from that, just imagine the process would start from the beginning; all questions would need to be answered again, and the casino reps would need to focus on both complaints.
Additionally, may I know where you found the casino that was licensed? As far as I can see, there is no license. Check it out.
And the validator is missing the green thick, probably because it is not active.
"To check a Gaming Curacao (365 / JAZ) license is valid, the easiest way is to click on the validator on the website. This will usually appear as a small, clickable logo"
Sadly, it can't be done:
Ažurirano od strane autora pre 11 meseci
Automatski prevedeno: