pre 4 meseci
is this what has been said to you or are you telling somebody
Question about Gambling websites with Curaçao license using incorrect Merchant Category code (strana 110)
pre 4 meseci
has anyone had any dealings with Gladys Technologies
pre 4 meseci
To be honest
these sound dodgy
i haven’t found anything on google relating to them
chargeback with your bank
pre 4 meseci
The banks usually know nothing about the payment service providers' schemes.
It's just a standard response from the bank, self-authorised, own fault. The bank is liable if they charge back the 3DS transactions.
However, the bank would have to fulfil its duty of care and report the transactions to Mastercard accordingly so that the merchants are blocked. It's almost the perfect way to launder money. No possibility of chargebacks because receipts are missing etc.
pre 4 meseci
Šta ste prijavili banci kada ste uspešno izvršili povraćaj sredstava? Koliko vam je trebalo da vratite naplatu? Zaglavio sam sa Revolutom. Hvala vam
Automatski prevedeno:
pre 4 meseci
I said to them that I’m raising a merchant dispute due to the company closing my account down and not returning my funds. I also told them that in my country(United Kingdom) it’s illegal for them to let you use their platform
2
pre 4 meseci
My chargebacks took a few weeks. Less than a month. I had no funds in the account but I did have cashback in there
pre 4 meseci
Uložio sam žalbu na odluku Svedbanke (gore) njihovom ombudsmanu za klijente.
Automatski prevedeno:
1
pre 4 meseci
I have around £4700 of transactions with Santeda through open banking I contacted my bank today and tried to raise a dispute but they were having none of it as I had received a transaction back from Santeda at some point I tried to say that they have just done this to keep me engaged and depositing funds but this fell on deaf ear’s, any advice or does it sound like a lost cause ? I’ve also been in touch with the financial ombudsman today explained the situation to see if they can do anything about this
pre 4 meseci
Tbh I’ve tried getting money bank from open banking and there’s literally no way as you can’t raise a chargeback. I tried contacting the payment provider who was WINTERMDSE for around 1800 and they just ignore me now so they’re never going to return the money either. The only way you can get it back is if Santeda refunds you, I’m not sure about financial ombudsman as I haven’t gone down that route. I feel like now you have your rejection from the bank, you can defiantly contact them to see if they can help. You can try say to them you have a gambling block on your card, you’re a vulnerable person and the company used a wrong merchant code to bypass the gambling block on your card, id write a fully prepared statement
1
pre 4 meseci
When I spoke to the bank on the same matter they say mmmm well it’s not fraud as you made the payments, we understand your situation but we can’t help.
1
Materialgirl84
pre 4 meseci
Tbh I doubt any of these shady companies will refund. They’re out to rob players, so they’ll take anything they will get. Their classic victim is UK players that are on Gamstop, as they know people with addictions will spend a shit load of money
3
pre 4 meseci
I wish there was some way of bringing Santeda down in the UK in the same way they have been warned and fined in France and Australia 😡
pre 4 meseci
Da li kojim slučajem znate kako da kontaktirate Santedu? Pisao sam Mistake i Velobet korisničkoj službi, ali oni i dalje odbijaju povraćaj novca.
Automatski prevedeno:
pre 4 meseci
Yes all of their casinos deny refunds - way too excited about making a killing by scamming vulnerable people via illegal payment methods
2
pre 4 meseci
Have you got the email for Enygma?
pre 4 meseci
Have you got Enygma contact email
pre 4 meseci
Have you tried disputing the transaction with your bank?
pre 4 meseci
lol so I complained to ceg and they sided with the casino. What a joke, they literally stole my money. This is what they wrote, it doesn’t even make sense to me just sounds like a load of jibberish.
The Operator, in the view of CEG, has acted in accordance with the public information on its website, to which the Operator has referred to, as well as provided supporting statements.
The Player has based his/her claim on an (alleged) violation of a norm (unlawful action). Even if this would be the case, which CEG was not able to establish, the relative aspect of the unlawfulness means that the norm infringed by the perpetrator must have been codified in order to protect the interest that has been harmed. The norm on which the player has based his claim does in this particular case, however, not pass the relativity test. Whatever may be of the alleged breach of a norm, as a consequence of not passing the relativity test, it is ruled that the Operator has acted in accordance with rules and regulations pertaining to the issues relating to the player.
pre 4 meseci
Dobio sam odgovor iz banke sada nakon skoro 60 dana. Oni ne pokreću žalbu. Po njima sam sam odobrio isplate. Dakle, ne možemo ništa da uradimo. Banke imaju leđa ovim svinjama. Tako da sam sada zatvorio tvoj račun u toj banci. Oni mogu povući
Automatski prevedeno:
