Mislim da ombudsman tera ove banke da zaista nešto urade, stvar je povraćaj sredstava, a onda ako izgubimo povraćaj sredstava jer formulišu neke laži da smo dobili robu/usluge onda to moramo da prihvatimo uprkos tome što znamo da je to prevara.
Ali da čak ni povraćaj sredstava nije šala i to je ono što je ombudsman efektivno rekao o ovim odlukama, dobra stvar je ako oni ne urade povraćaj sredstava, a ombudsman kaže da je trebalo da to uradite, onda su banke prinuđene da plaćaju iz svojih ruku džep koji bi uskoro trebalo da ih natera da promene svoje postupke.
Srećno druže, ako budem uspešan sa Čejsom, onda nemam ništa protiv da koristiš moj slučaj kao primer za slanje Starlingovoj.
Čekam i kreditne kartice, pa opet ako želite da podelite brojeve slučajeva sa Starling, ako budem uspešan, onda nemam ništa protiv. To bi bile Visa kreditna kartica i Mastercard debitna tako da bi sporovi ionako bili njihove reference
I think the ombudsman is making these banks actually do something, thing is chargeback and then if we lose the chargeback because they formulate some lies that we did get goods/ services then we have to take that on the chin despite us knowing it’s fraud.
But to not even chargeback is a joke and that’s what the ombudsman has effectively said on these decisions, the good thing is if they don’t do the chargeback and ombudsman says you should have then the banks are being forced to pay out of their own pocket that should soon make them change their actions.
Good luck mate, if I am successful with Chase then I don’t mind you using my case as an example to send to Starling.
Waiting on credit cards as well so again if you want to share the case numbers to Starling if I am successful then I don’t mind. These would be Visa credit card and Mastercard debit so the disputes would be their references anyway
Automatski prevedeno: