Zdravo ponovo.
Vaša žalba je već detaljno pregledana i zvanično zatvorena. Svi razumemo vašu frustraciju, ali otvaranje istog problema u različitim temama neće promeniti ishod.
Pored toga, imajte na umu da uslovi korišćenja svakog kazina navode da su igrači odgovorni za bezbednost svojih pristupnih podataka. Iako razumem zašto ste podigli zahtev da kazino javno dokaže ko je igrao na nalogu, to nije nešto što se realno može učiniti. Spolja, niko ne može da proveri ko je zapravo pristupio nalogu, bilo da ste to bili vi ili treća strana, tako da zahtev za dokazom na forumu zvuči prilično pogrešno — možete li dokazati da to niste bili vi? Ista logika, suprotna perspektiva, rekao bih. Nadam se da razumete šta mislim.
Ova logika je razlog zašto sajber kriminal ili incidenti zloupotrebe naloga ne spadaju u delokrug našeg Indeksa bezbednosti i sistema ocenjivanja i smatraju se sajber kriminalom. Ne radi se o ignorisanju vaših dokaza; radi se o granicama onoga što se može istražiti i pravedno proceniti.
Znam da je izazovno, ali bi bilo bolje da se nosimo sa tim nego da nastavimo ovako. Nemoj sebi dalje nauditi, molim te.
Hello again.
Your complaint has already been reviewed in detail and officially closed. We all understand your frustration, but opening the same issue in different threads will not change the outcome.
In addition, please keep in mind that every casino’s terms and conditions state that players are responsible for keeping their login credentials safe. While I understand why you raised the request for the casino to publicly prove who played the account, this is not something that can realistically be done. From the outside, no one can verify who actually accessed the account, whether it was you or a third party, so the request for proof in the forum sounds quite misplaced—can you prove it wasn't you? Same logic, opposite perspective, I'd say. I hope you understand what I mean.
This logic is why cybercrime or account misuse incidents fall outside the scope of our Safety Index and rating system and are considered a cybercrime. It’s not about ignoring your evidence; it’s about the limits of what can be investigated and fairly assessed.
I know it is challenging but it would be better to deal with it rather than continue like this. Do not harm yourself further, please.
Automatski prevedeno: