Hvala i vama. Pokušavao sam da kažem da se u nekim kazinima stil igre sa niskim rizikom smatra protivpravilnim jer pranje novca zahteva opklade sa niskim rizikom. Ali pretpostavljam da oboje smatramo da nedostatak konteksta može dovesti do prilično iracionalne upotrebe tih pravila.
Moja greška, nisam hteo da u to upletem odgovorno kockanje.
Voleo bih da znam zašto je kazino toliko zainteresovan za sve te detalje; jedino što sada mogu da smislim je da prate određeni obrazac koji koristi grupa igrača i da ste iz nekog razloga nekako bili uključeni. Pa ipak, to je samo pretpostavka, ništa više.
Teško je bilo šta preporučiti dok god oboje ne razumemo šta se dešava. Sarađivao bih sa kazinom da vratim novac, a zatim bih otišao, pretpostavljam. Razumem da takvo iskustvo nije baš ohrabrujuće za moguću buduću saradnju.
Thank you too. I was trying to say that in some casinos a low-risk playstyle is considered against the rules because money laundering requires low-risk bets. But I guess we both feel that lack of context can cause quite irrational usage of those rules.
My bad, I didn't mean to bring responsible gambling into that.
I wish I knew why the casino is so interested in all those details; the only thing I can come up with now is that they are following a certain pattern used by a group of players and for some reason, you were somehow included. Yet it is just an assumption, nothing else.
Hard to recommend anything as long as we both do not understand what has been happening. I would work with the casino to get the money back and then leave, I guess. I understand such experience is not very reassuring for possible future cooperation.
Automatski prevedeno: