zdravo,
Želeo bih da izbegnem generalizam. Verujem da sam već ranije rekao toliko toga u vezi sa tim:
„Po mom mišljenju, ako kazino uzme dobitak, oni se mogu nazvati varalicama, ali kada kazino uzme privatna sredstva, oni više nisu varalice, već su lopovi.
Zavisi od detalja. Ako igrač prekrši pravila, njegov dobitak se oduzima, a najverovatnije će račun biti zatvoren. U takvim slučajevima, kazina uopšte ne vraćaju izgubljene depozite ili depozite.
Takođe, ako će nepošteni kazino poništiti vaš dobitak iz bilo kog razloga - samo da vam ne isplati, da li biste očekivali da vam vrate depozite? Upravo sam rekao da nema smisla zbog logike situacije. Da li bolje razumete prirodu ove informacije, molim vas?
Ako bilo koji kazino odbije da isplati dobitke, zvučalo bi prilično neprikladno dodati još jedno upozorenje koje kaže: „Ovaj kazino ne dobija nazad depozite" jer će svako videti da Slotti Casino uopšte ne odgovara na žalbe. Informacija „Visoka vrednost zadržanih dobitaka u pritužbama igrača u odnosu na veličinu kazina" je u pregledu.
Razumem da biste cenili da pregled bude jednostavniji, ali vaš predlog uopšte ne bi pomogao. Igrači ulažu u kazina da bi dobili dobitak, a ne da bi povukli depozite, rekao bih. Dakle, upozorenje u kojem se navodi da je kazino zadržao dobitke takođe uključuje aktivni balans igrača u tom pitanju.
„Kazino ne želi ni da započne dijalog o ovom pitanju, ne verujem da kazino ne zna da postoji otvoren slučaj jer im se šalju obaveštenja, kazino je takođe svestan da krši propise, ali ne želi da to objasni
Možete li priznati da sam u pravu u vezi ovoga?"
Ne radi se o priznavanju bilo čega. Slažem se da je ovaj kazino ignorisao i vašu žalbu, koja je protiv poštenog kockanja. Kao rezultat, odgovarajuće informacije su predstavljene u pregledu kazina.
Verovali ili ne, osim pokradenog depozita, manje-više isto kažemo.
Hello,
I would like to avoid generalism. I believe I already said that much in this regard previously in the past:
"In my opinion, if the casino takes the winnings, they can be called cheaters, but when the casino takes private funds, they are no longer cheaters they are thieves."
Depends on the details. If the player breaches the rules, his winnings are confiscated, and most likely the account will be closed. In such cases, casinos do not refund lost deposits or deposits at all.
Also, if a dishonest casino is going to void your winnings for any reason - just not to pay you, would you expect them to return your deposits? I just said it makes little sense due to the logic of the situation. Do you understand the nature of this information better, please?
If any casino refuses to pay out the winnings, it would sound quite innapropriate to add another warning saying, "This casino does not get back deposits" because anyone will see that Slotty Casino does not respond to the complaints in the first place. The information "High value of withheld winnings in player complaints in relation to the casino's size" is in the review.
I understand you would appreciate the review being more straightforward, but your suggestion would not help at all. Players deposit in casinos to gain winnings, not to withdraw the deposits, I'd say. Thus, a warning stating that the casino withheld the winnings also includes players' active balance in that matter of speaking.
"The casino does not even want to start a dialogue on this matter, I do not believe that the casino does not know that there is an open case because notifications are sent to them, the casino is also aware that it is breaking the regulations but does not want to explain it
Can you admit that I am right about this?"
It's not about admitting anything. I agree this casino has ignored your complaint as well, which is against fair gambling. As a result, the appropriate information is presented in the casino's review.
Believe me or not, aside from the stolen deposit, we more or less say the same.
Automatski prevedeno: