Hvala vam na snimku ekrana.
Ujutro sam sa svojim timom razgovarao o ovoj situaciji i, prema najboljem razumevanju, uvereni smo da ponovno otvaranje slučaja, koji je ranije odbijen zbog sportskog klađenja, nije bio najbolji tok akcije. Mislim da sam to već pomenuo u svom prethodnom odgovoru, pa da budem konkretniji:
Žalba je odbijena jer se činilo da ste se kladili na sport. Nakon što ste to uradili, nalog je zatvoren.
U zahtevu za ponovno otvaranje, između ostalog, stoji da ste uplatili 100€ i da bez ikakve opklade vaš nalog je zatvoren i da niste mogli da kontaktirate kazino.
Zapravo zvuči kao ista situacija opisana na dva načina – izostavljeno je samo sportsko klađenje koje bi dovelo do odbijanja zahteva.
Možete li, molim vas, potvrditi da li su okolnosti iza ovog „novog" zatvaranja računa u istom kazinu bile potpuno drugačije?
U svakom slučaju, žao nam je što smo dobili netačno objašnjenje. Problem je situacija koju sam naveo, a ne bilo kakve „nedosledne informacije" bilo koje vrste, po našem mišljenju.
Sačekaću vaše ažuriranje o drugom zatvaranju naloga, ali želim još jednom da naglasim jednu stvar:
Svi događaji povezani sa sportskim klađenjem i njihovim pravilima su van našeg domašaja i neće biti prihvaćeni u obliku žalbe.
Thank you for the screenshot.
In the morning, I discussed this situation with my team, and according to the best of our understanding, we are convinced that reopening the case, which was previously rejected due to sports betting, was not the best course of action. I believe I already mentioned that in my previous response, so let me be more concrete:
The complaint was rejected because it seemed you had placed a sports bet. After you did, the account was closed.
The reopening request, among other things, says that you deposited 100€ and without any single bet, your account was closed and you could not contact the casino.
It actually sounds like the same situation described in two ways - only the sports betting, which would have led to the request's rejection, was left out.
Could you please confirm if the circumstances behind this "new" account closure at the same casino were entirely different?
In any case, we are sorry to see you were provided with an inaccurate explanation. The situation I outlined is the problem, not any "inconsistent information" of any kind, in our opinion.
I will wait for your update on the second account closure, but I want to emphasize one thing again:
Any events associated with sports betting and its rules are outside our reach and won't be accepted in the form of complaint.
Automatski prevedeno: