lol pa sam se požalio cegu i oni su stali na stranu kazina. Kakva šala, bukvalno su mi ukrali novac. Ovo su napisali, meni to čak i nema smisla, samo zvuči kao gomila zezanja.
Operater je, po mišljenju CEG-a, postupio u skladu sa javnom informacijom na svojoj veb stranici, na koju se Operater pozivao, kao i dao propratne izjave.
Igrač je svoju tvrdnju zasnovao na (navodnom) kršenju norme (nezakonita radnja). Čak i da je to slučaj, što CEG nije mogao da utvrdi, relativni aspekt protivpravnosti znači da je norma koju je prekršio počinilac morala biti kodifikovana kako bi se zaštitio interes koji je oštećen. Međutim, norma na kojoj je igrač zasnovao svoju tvrdnju u ovom konkretnom slučaju ne prolazi test relativnosti. Šta god da se radi o navodnom kršenju neke norme, kao posledica nepolaganja testa relativnosti, smatra se da je Operater postupio u skladu sa pravilima i propisima koji se odnose na pitanja koja se odnose na igrača.
lol so I complained to ceg and they sided with the casino. What a joke, they literally stole my money. This is what they wrote, it doesn’t even make sense to me just sounds like a load of jibberish.
The Operator, in the view of CEG, has acted in accordance with the public information on its website, to which the Operator has referred to, as well as provided supporting statements.
The Player has based his/her claim on an (alleged) violation of a norm (unlawful action). Even if this would be the case, which CEG was not able to establish, the relative aspect of the unlawfulness means that the norm infringed by the perpetrator must have been codified in order to protect the interest that has been harmed. The norm on which the player has based his claim does in this particular case, however, not pass the relativity test. Whatever may be of the alleged breach of a norm, as a consequence of not passing the relativity test, it is ruled that the Operator has acted in accordance with rules and regulations pertaining to the issues relating to the player.
Automatski prevedeno: