ForumDiskusija o prigovorimaQuestion about Gambling websites with Curaçao license using incorrect Merchant Category code

Question about Gambling websites with Curaçao license using incorrect Merchant Category code (strana 260)

pre 1 godinu od kirekin
|
499044 pregleda 5221 odgovora |
|
1...259 260 261...264
Dodajte post
Williamj86
pre 4 dana

They have already raised them im sure you said bud

paulmcewan05
pre 4 dana

Yeah they have just thought it might help my case if they know my gambling block was on

Williamj86
pre 4 dana

If they have raised them that is it no need to justify anything now they would have checked that it bud they cannot do any more on their side now

Ažurirano od strane autora pre 4 dana
paulmcewan05
pre 4 dana

But maybe if they decline the refund I could use that to go forward with the FOC you think. How you doing Anways buddy

paulmcewan05
pre 4 dana

What are you saying the link is to Sumup mate? What is a description on bank saying?

Williamj86
pre 4 dana

If they decline thats it bud nothing FOS can do as they tried them I am not bad mate keeping going

boots2024
pre 4 dana

Hi Boots the bank said this and I seen sumup on screen when paying it says smpay thats all I know

pre 4 dana

Hi Boots the bank said this and I seen sumup on screen when paying it says smpay thats all I know

pre 4 dana

But sumup have not replied to say it is not them which is odd as you would think they would right away ! maybe the bank can see where they go

paulmcewan05
pre 4 dana

I’m not convinced mate, I’ve used Sumup loads of times for genuine, non gambling related transactions and it comes up as Sumup*(name of merchant here).



boots2024
pre 4 dana

Ok maybe that bank worker is wrong then that is what he told me though and the complaints hander said he will review phone calls as part of the investigation just shows you if not how much they are not doing the job correctly ! I deffo seen sumup appear when doing a payment though if it is them it should be a certain refund for all no questions asked !

paulmcewan05
pre 4 dana

I’m hoping so as they’d be more of an operation than these dodgy processors.

What were the transaction description? Maginc?

boots2024
pre 4 dana

(I.e Sumup more likely to play ball and refund)

boots2024
pre 4 dana

Yes mine had that on it Boots !

boots2024
pre 4 dana

Well yes but no reply so far ! I deffo think the bank can recover these Uk based transactions easily

Ažurirano od strane autora pre 4 dana
Post od Elijahanth je obrisan
paulmcewan05
pre 4 dana

So let’s assume it’s not Sumup how do you successfully do a chargeback in that situation since you have nothing on the processor or merchant?

boots2024
pre 4 dana

Well its still incorrect MCC code so just the same thing Boots

pre 4 dana

SmPayMaginc

SmPayGamingstore

Byte News


It is this 3 nobody of us have founded yet.

tamiirender
pre 2 dana

That’s great news.


i M about to do same with them so gives me hope.


can i ask were you truthful about what transactions were for

Billyh18
pre 2 dana

Can't find a contact for Santeda, as for goldenbet, they pretty much said i'm liable for not reading their ToS as they're prohibited from offering their services to the UK, wouldn't help me at all, waiting for the ombudsman still as chase basically said it was gambling and they don't cover gambling per mastercard ToS even though the MCC wasn't gambling, it was gaming and digital goods. The FoS has been around a seven week wait so far, maybe a touch longer and they've not began the investigation proper, just said they will appoint an agent to my case when they have one free as they have an increased workload.

1...259 260 261...264
Idi na stranicuod 264 stranica

Pridružite se zajednici

Morate biti ulogovani da bi dodali post.

Ulogujte se
flash-message-news
Casino Guru Vesti – Pratite dnevne vesti iz industrije kockanja
Pratite nas na društvenim mrežama - Dnevni postovi, bez depozitni bonusi, novi slotovi i još toga
Pretplatite se na naš bilten i saznajte gde su najnoviji bez depozitni bonusi, novi slotovi i druge vesti