Rezime događaja:
Registracija naloga i početna verifikacija: Registrovao/la sam nalog kod Legendz-a pod svojim tačnim i legalnim imenom. Ubrzo nakon toga, i pre nego što sam ostvario/la bilo kakve značajne dobitke, uspešno sam završio/la potpunu verifikaciju identiteta preko njihovog obaveznog provajdera treće strane, Veriff-a. Moj nalog je bio u potpunosti verifikovan i u dobrom stanju.
Igranje i dobici: Nakon uspešne verifikacije Veriff-a, nastavio sam da igram na platformi, pod pretpostavkom da je moj nalog u potpunosti u skladu sa propisima. Akumulirao sam dobitke ekvivalentne preko 800 američkih dolara u Sweepstakes Coins-ima.
Zahtev za povlačenje i druga verifikacija: Kada sam pokrenuo zahtev za otkup mojih 800 dolara, Legendz nije obradio povlačenje. Umesto toga, zahtevali su da prođem kroz drugi, poseban, interni KYC proces. U potpunosti sam se pridržavao uslova i po drugi put podneo svu traženu dokumentaciju.
Konfiskacija nakon druge verifikacije: Tek nakon što sam prošao i početnu Veriff verifikaciju i njihovu naknadnu internu KYC proveru, Legendz je naglo zatvorio moj račun i konfiskovao celokupno stanje od preko 800 dolara. Navedeni razlog je bio kršenje višestrukih naloga.
Suština spora:
Radnje kazina predstavljaju jasan slučaj proceduralne nepravde i loše vere.
Implicitno prihvatanje: Podvrgavanjem i provođenjem kroz početnu, rigoroznu Veriff verifikaciju, Legendz je formalno prihvatio moj nalog kao validan. U toj fazi su imali sve potrebne informacije da identifikuju bilo kakvu navodnu vezu sa drugim nalogom.
Predatorski tajming: Kazino mi je dozvolio da nastavim sa uplatom depozita i igrom nakon što je ova početna verifikacija završena. Tek su odlučili da primene svoje pravilo o višestrukim računima tokom procesa isplate, nakon što sam već pobedio. Ovo stvara situaciju „bez dobitka" za igrača, gde se račun smatra važećim za primanje depozita, ali nevažećim za isplatu dobitaka.
Dvostruka verifikacija: Prisiljavanje na drugi KYC proces u trenutku otkupa, samo da bi se potom zatvorio račun, snažno ukazuje na to da se njihov sistem verifikacije ne koristi za dužnu pažnju, već kao alat za odlaganje i odbijanje legitimnih isplata. Imali su dve jasne prilike da zatvore račun pre nego što sam pobedio, ali nisu uspeli u tome.
Kazino ne može retroaktivno primeniti svoje uslove nakon što je dva puta potvrdio moj identitet i prihvatio moje opklade u dobroj veri. Ovo je predatorska praksa osmišljena da zaštiti kuću od dobitnika.
Željena rezolucija:
Tražim punu isplatu mog legitimnog dobitka od 800 dolara. Legendz je verifikovao moj nalog ne jednom, već dva puta, i trebalo bi da bude u obavezi da poštuje opklade napravljene i osvojene dok je nalog bio u verifikovanom stanju.
Summary of Events:
Account Registration and Initial Verification: I registered an account with Legendz under my correct and legal name. Shortly after, and before accumulating any significant winnings, I successfully completed a full identity verification through their required third-party provider, Veriff. My account was fully verified and in good standing.
Gameplay and Winnings: Following the successful Veriff verification, I continued to play on the platform, assuming my account was fully compliant. I accumulated winnings equivalent to $800+ USD in Sweepstakes Coins.
Withdrawal Request and Second Verification: When I initiated a redemption request for my $800, Legendz did not process the withdrawal. Instead, they required me to undergo a second, separate, in-house KYC process. I complied fully and submitted all requested documentation for a second time.
Confiscation After Second Verification: Only after I had passed both the initial Veriff verification and their subsequent in-house KYC check did Legendz abruptly close my account and confiscate my entire $800+ balance. The reason cited was a multi-account breach.
Core of the Dispute:
The casino's actions represent a clear case of procedural unfairness and bad faith.
Implied Acceptance: By subjecting me to and passing me through the initial, rigorous Veriff verification, Legendz formally accepted my account as valid. They had all the information necessary to identify any alleged link to another account at that stage.
Predatory Timing: The casino allowed me to continue depositing and playing after this initial verification was complete. They only chose to enforce their multi-account rule during the withdrawal process, after I had already won. This creates a "no-win" situation for the player, where an account is considered valid for taking deposits but invalid for paying out winnings.
Double Verification: Forcing a second KYC process at the point of redemption, only to then close the account, strongly suggests that their verification system is not used for due diligence but as a tool to delay and deny legitimate withdrawals. They had two clear opportunities to close the account before I won, but failed to do so.
The casino cannot retroactively apply its terms after having twice verified my identity and accepted my wagers in good faith. This is a predatory practice designed to protect the house from winners.
Desired Resolution:
I request full payment of my legitimate winnings of $800. Legendz verified my account not once, but twice, and should be required to honor the wagers made and won while the account was in a verified state.
Automatski prevedeno: