Dragi Rooli Casino timu ,
Hvala vam na pojašnjenju i e-poruci.
Međutim, ako je nešto u Uslovima i odredbama kazina, to ne znači automatski da je ispravno ili pošteno.
„ S obzirom na to, maksimalni dobitak ostaje i nakon što se ispuni uslov za klađenje.
Ne primoravamo korisnike da se povuku u trenutku završetka bonus opklade, tako da proveravamo izvor dobitaka kada korisnik zatraži isplatu.
U ovom slučaju, dobici su ostvareni isključivo od bonusa bez depozita i to je razlog zašto su dobici ponovo maksimalno smanjeni."
Koji je razlog da se uslovi bonusa primenjuju nakon što su ispunjeni uslovi za klađenje i bonus uspešno konvertovan u saldo koji se može povući pošto se od ovog trenutka smatra pravim novcem?
Kako kazino zamišlja dalju igru igrača sa stvarnim saldom novca dobijenim na taj način nego da podigne maksimalan iznos gotovine i uplati ga nazad na račun (ali kazino ne primorava igrače na to...)? Zašto je igračima dozvoljeno da nastave da igraju nakon što ispune uslove za klađenje (sa saldom koji se može povući za koji možemo da smatramo pravim novcem, oslobođen od svega preko maksimalnog isplate) ako u suštini nisu u mogućnosti da osvoje više, ali mogu da izgube?
Koja je razlika između nastavka igre odmah nakon ispunjavanja uslova za bonus klađenje i ispunjavanja svih uslova bonusa I povlačenja maksimalnog gotovinskog iznosa i naknadnog depozita nazad u kazino?
Da li postoji neko dodatno obaveštenje o ovoj činjenici/pravilu i njegovoj primeni nakon sastanka sa VR-ovima? Ako jeste, možete li to pojasniti i dati nam snimak ekrana?
Nažalost, ne možemo se složiti sa primenom maksimalnog isplate više od jednom, posebno ako su svi uslovi bonusa u potpunosti ispunjeni, saldo je konvertovan u saldo koji se može povući (pravi novac), više nema razloga za primenu pravila bonusa i korisnici nisu dovoljno obavešteni o tome kada ispune uslove za klađenje.
Ako sam previdio nešto važno, slobodno me ispravite. U suprotnom, želimo da preporučimo kazinu da vrati dobitke korisnika koji su drugi put zaplenjeni.
Dear Rooli Casino team,
Thank you for the clarification and your email.
However, if something is in the casino's Terms and Conditions, it does not automatically mean it is correct or fair.
"That being said, the maximum win persists after the wagering requirement is met.
We do not force users to withdraw at time of completion of bonus wagering so we check source of winnings when a user requests a cashout.
In this case, the winnings were made solely from the no deposit bonus and this is the reason the winnings were then cut to the maximum once again."
What is the reason for bonus terms being applied after the wagering requirements were met and the bonus successfully converted to a withdrawable balance since from this moment it is considered real money?
How does the casino imagine a player's further play with a real money balance obtained in such a way than to withdraw the maximum cashout and deposit it back into the account (but the casino does not force players to do it...)? Why are players allowed to continue playing after meeting the wagering requirements (with a withdrawable balance that we can consider real money, cleared from everything over the maximum cashout) if they are basically not able to win more but they can lose?
What is the difference between continuing to play right after meeting bonus wagering requirements and meeting all bonus conditions AND withdrawing the maximum cashout and subsequent deposit of it back to the casino?
Is there any additional notification about this fact/rule and its application after meeting WRs? If so, can you clarify it and provide us with a screenshot?
Unfortunately, we cannot agree with applying the maximum cashout more than once, especially if all the bonus terms and conditions completely were met, the balance was converted to a withdrawable balance (real money), there is no reason for bonus rules application anymore, and users are not notified about it sufficiently upon meeting the wagering requirements.
If I overlooked something important, feel free to correct me. Otherwise, we would like to recommend the casino restore the user's winnings that were confiscated a second time.
Izmenjeno od strane Casino Guru administratora
Automatski prevedeno: