Naslov žalbe: Kazino odbija da refundira pogrešan depozit uprkos tome što je dao tačne podatke o računu
Podnosim ovu žalbu zbog odbijanja Slotlords-a da refundira depozit koji je greškom uplaćen sa računa mog partnera, uprkos mojoj neposrednoj transparentnosti i punoj saradnji u pružanju potrebnih detalja.
Vremenski okvir događaja:
1. Slučajni depozit: Prilikom uplate depozita, sačuvani bankarski detalji mog partnera su greškom izabrani na uređaju koji sam koristio.
2. Odmah obaveštenje: Odmah sam shvatio grešku i odmah kontaktirao kazino da ih obavestim i zatražim povraćaj novca na račun svog partnera.
3. Prvi odgovor kazina: Kazino je naveo da depoziti trećih strana nisu dozvoljeni i da bi moj račun mogao biti zatvoren.
4. Pružanje detalja o nalogu mog partnera: Dao sam sve neophodne bankarske detalje za račun svog partnera, uključujući račun na kome je on jedini vlasnik.
5. Odbijanje kazina: Kazino je odbio da obradi povraćaj sredstava na taj račun, navodeći da im je potreban drugi bankovni račun sa SVIFT kodom, kripto novčanik ili MiFiniti nalog.
6. Objašnjeno bankarsko ograničenje: Moj partner i ja imamo odvojene račune kod Tangerine, koja ne podržava SVIFT transakcije. Pošto povraćaj sredstava na prvobitni depozitni račun nije bio moguć prema njihovim zahtevima, tada sam dao detalje za naš zajednički račun, koji moj partner takođe legalno poseduje.
7. Kazino i dalje odbija povraćaj: Uprkos tome što je dao važeći račun u legalnom vlasništvu na ime mog partnera, kazino nastavlja da odbija povraćaj bez davanja valjanog opravdanja.
Ključna pitanja:
a€¢ Odmah sam otkrio grešku i postupio u dobroj nameri, prateći sve zahteve kazina za alternativnim bankarskim detaljima.
a€¢ Kazino potvrđuje da bi povraćaj novca trebalo da ide mom partneru, ali odbija da ga obradi samo zato što originalna banka ne podržava međunarodne (SVIFT) transfere.
a€¢ Obezbeđen je zajednički račun u legalnom vlasništvu, koji se može proveriti, kome moj partner takođe ima pun pristup, ali kazino i dalje odbija da obradi povraćaj sredstava.
a€¢ Njihov zahtev za SVIFT nalogom je nerazuman, jer su već obavešteni da banka mog partnera ne podržava SVIFT transakcije.
a€¢ Ovo se čini kao nepravedan pokušaj zadržavanja sredstava, a ne kao legitimno pitanje usklađenosti.
Željena rezolucija:
Zahtevam da Slotlords odmah obradi povraćaj sredstava na obezbeđeni zajednički račun, pošto je legalno na ime mog partnera. Ako odbiju, tražim jasno, opravdano objašnjenje zašto odbijaju povraćaj sredstava na pravni račun koji je u vlasništvu mog partnera.
Ako ne dođe do rešenja, tražim kontakt detalje za regulatorno telo koje nadgleda operacije Slotlords-a kako bih mogao dalje da eskaliram stvar.
Cenim pomoć Casino Gurua da obezbedi da Slotlords sledi poštene i etičke poslovne prakse.
Hvala.
Complaint Title: Casino Refusing to Refund Mistaken Deposit Despite Providing Correct Account Details
I am filing this complaint due to Slotlords’ refusal to refund a deposit that was mistakenly made from my partner’s account, despite my immediate transparency and full cooperation in providing the necessary details.
Timeline of Events:
1. Accidental Deposit: While making a deposit, my partner’s saved banking details were mistakenly selected on the device I was using.
2. Immediate Notification: I realized the mistake right away and immediately contacted the casino to inform them and request a refund back to my partner’s account.
3. Casino’s Initial Response: The casino stated that third-party deposits are not allowed and that my account could be subject to closure.
4. Providing My Partner’s Account Details: I provided all necessary banking details for my partner’s account, including an account where they are the sole owner.
5. Casino’s Refusal: The casino refused to process the refund to that account, stating that they need a different bank account with a SWIFT code, crypto wallet, or MiFinity account.
6. Banking Limitation Explained: My partner and I both hold separate accounts with Tangerine, which does not support SWIFT transactions. Since a refund to the original deposit account was not possible under their requirements, I then provided details for our joint account, which my partner also legally owns.
7. Casino Still Refusing the Refund: Despite providing a valid, legally owned account in my partner’s name, the casino continues to refuse the refund without providing a valid justification.
Key Issues:
• I immediately disclosed the mistake and acted in good faith, following all the casino’s requests for alternative banking details.
• The casino acknowledges that the refund should go to my partner but is refusing to process it simply because the original bank does not support international (SWIFT) transfers.
• A legally owned, verifiable joint account was provided, which my partner also has full access to, yet the casino is still refusing to process the refund.
• Their demand for a SWIFT-enabled account is unreasonable, as they have already been informed that my partner’s bank does not support SWIFT transactions.
• This feels like an unfair attempt to withhold funds rather than a legitimate compliance issue.
Desired Resolution:
I request that Slotlords immediately process the refund to the joint account provided, as it is legally in my partner’s name. If they refuse, I request a clear, justified explanation for why they are denying a refund to a legal account under my partner’s ownership.
If no resolution is provided, I request contact details for the regulatory authority overseeing Slotlords’ operations so I can escalate the matter further.
I appreciate Casino Guru’s assistance in ensuring that Slotlords follows fair and ethical business practices.
Thank you.
Automatski prevedeno: