pozdrav svima,
Žao mi je zbog kašnjenja.
Već znam šta se ovde dešava. 'Bez pravila' nije toliko važno u ovom slučaju, jonnotron. Reč je o opštim pravilima o bonusima kazina i njihovoj primeni.
Dragi Tomas i Brango kazino ,
Hvala vam na e-poruci i datim podacima.
Iako su sve radnje sprovedene u skladu sa uslovima kazina, kao što ste pomenuli, bojim se da ta pravila običnom igraču nisu potpuno jasna. Čak postoje i kontradiktorni delovi.
Da budem iskren, sećam se da sam imao nekoliko slučajeva u prošlosti u vezi sa sličnim problemima, a čak smo imali i video poziv sa predstavnicima kazina Brango i njegovih drugih sestrinskih kazina. Dogovorili smo se da kazino treba da implementira iskačuće prozore kada igrači padnu ispod 1 $/€, što je, ako se dobro sećam, i učinjeno. Napravili smo ovaj dogovor upravo zbog pravila koje se primenjuje u ovom slučaju i njegovog pogrešnog/nejasnog teksta. Iskačući prozor treba da obavesti igrače o daljim opcijama/akcijama kako ne bi upali u „zamku" beskonačne primene pravila bonusa. Iako se to odnosilo na situaciju kada je stanje ispod 1 $/€, ovde mogu da vidim sličnu situaciju.
Stoga imam nekoliko dodatnih pitanja da razjasnim situaciju.
Da li postoji iskočni prozor koji informiše igrače o mogućim budućim akcijama nakon što se ispune uslovi za klađenje?
Bonusi se obično završavaju ispunjavanjem uslova za klađenje ili zahtevom za povlačenje. Ako je korisnik ispunio uslove klađenja dotičnog bonusa i nije prekršio nijedno drugo pravilo, zašto bi pravila o bonusu i dalje važila za njegov saldo, koji je konvertovan u njegov saldo od stvarnog novca (koji se može povući?) Da li sam dobro razumeo da mu je u tom trenutku (ispunjavajući uslove za klađenje) bilo dozvoljeno da podigne svoj raspoloživi iznos? Ako jeste i još uvek je kao u prošlosti - da li je trebalo da povuče svoja sredstva odmah nakon što ispuni uslove za klađenje i da ih vrati na račun da bi nastavio da igra?
Ako jeste, koja je razlika između nastavka igranja i povlačenja i naknadnog deponovanja ovih dobitaka nazad na račun kako bi on mogao da igra?
Ako kazino želi da primeni pravila i ograničenja bonusa nakon što se ispune uslovi za klađenje na bonuse, trebalo bi da bude u mogućnosti da to primeni svojim sistemom/SV kao što je to tokom igre sa aktivnim bonusom, ili, barem igrači treba da budu nekako jasno informisani o ovim činjenicama i pravilima (na primer, iskačućim prozorom) pošto je reč pre o specifičnim pravilima koja nisu uobičajena u industriji.
Kako igrač može saznati – pored pomalo nejasnih opštih pravila(a) bonusa – da njegov saldo stvarnog novca (koji se može povući) treba povući i deponovati nazad da bi nastavio da igra?
Ili je to bio lepljivi bonus? Samo to bi moglo značajno da promeni situaciju.
Greetings all,
I am sorry for the delay.
I already know what is going on here. 'No rules' are not so important in this case, jonnotron. It is about the casino's general bonus rules and their application.
Dear Thomas and Brango Casino,
Thank you for your email and the provided data.
Although all actions were conducted in accordance with the casino's terms, as you mentioned, I am afraid those rules are not completely clear to a regular player. Even there are contradictory parts.
To be honest, I remember I had several cases in the past regarding similar issues, and we even had a video call with representatives of Brango Casino and its other sister casinos. We made a deal that the casino should have implemented pop-ups once players fall under 1 $/€, which, if I remember correctly, was done. We made this deal exactly because of the rule applied in this case and its misleading/unclear wording. The pop-up should inform players about further options/actions to not fall into a "trap" of never-ending bonus rules application. Although it was related to the situation when a balance is under 1 $/€, I can see a similar situation here.
Therefore, I have a few additional questions to clarify the situation.
Is there also a pop-up informing players about possible future actions after wagering requirements are met?
The bonuses are usually ended by meeting the wagering requirements or a withdrawal request. If the user met the wagering requirements of the bonus in question and did not breach any other rules, why should the bonus rules still apply to his balance, which was converted to his real money (withdrawable) balance? Do I understand correctly that at that point (meeting the wagering requirements), he was allowed to withdraw his available balance? If yes and it is still like in the past - was he supposed to withdraw his funds right after meeting the wagering requirements and deposit them back to the account to continue playing?
If so, what is the difference between continuing playing and withdrawing and subsequently depositing these winnings back into the account so he can play?
If the casino wants to apply bonus rules and restrictions after the bonus wagering requirements are met, it should be also able to enforce it by its system/SW as it is during a play with an active bonus, or, at least the players should be somehow clearly informed about these facts and rules (for example, by a pop-up) since we are talking rather about specific rules that are not common in the industry.
How can a player find out - besides a bit unclear general bonus rule(s) - that his real money (withdrawable) balance needs to be withdrawn and deposited back to continue playing?
Or, was it a sticky bonus? Only that could significantly change the situation.
Izmenjeno od strane Casino Guru administratora
Automatski prevedeno: