Zdravo angelbooty36,
Žao nam je, trajalo je duže od očekivanog.
Dragi Spinago Casino tim,
U Casino Guru-u stavljamo veliki naglasak na pošteno kockanje. To znači da ni kazino ni igrač ne bi trebali dobiti nepravednu prednost. Uvjeti i odredbe kazina treba da osiguraju da igrači ne dobiju nepravednu prednost u odnosu na kazino. U isto vrijeme, ne bi trebali biti nepravedni prema igračima. Više možete pročitati u našem Kodeksu poštenog kockanja: https://casino.guru/fair-gambling-codex-for-casinos . Ovo također koristimo kao osnovu za naše odluke u vezi sa žalbama. Poenta je stvoriti sigurno i korisničko okruženje za igrače čak i za one koji ne čitaju cijele T&C-e (vrlo malo ih čita) i nisu iskusni igrači. Činjenica je da je jedan račun po osobi standardno pravilo u industriji. Ali nisu svi igrači toga svjesni. Glavna poenta ovog pravila je zaštita od zloupotrebe ponuda dobrodošlice. Ako igrač dvaput uzme bonus dobrodošlice, to je nepravedna prednost i slažemo se da svaki dobitak treba biti poništen. Međutim, ovdje to nije slučaj.
Hajde da sumiramo ključne tačke ovog slučaja:
- Igrač je otvorio drugi račun u dobroj namjeri, nesvjestan da je to protivno pravilima
- Igrač nije uzeo bonus, tako da nema nepravedne prednosti
- Prvi račun igrača je zatvoren na osnovu njihovog zahtjeva, nije samoisključen zbog problema sa igranjem
- Igračev drugi račun je u potpunosti verifikovan. Ovo je važno jer je u ovom trenutku (ako ne i ranije) kazino trebao shvatiti da igrač već ima račun. Logično je da igračica pretpostavi da je sve u redu ako prođe verifikaciju.
Uzimajući u obzir sve ovo, smatramo da bi pošten pristup kazina bio da plati igraču. Iako je nenamjerno prekršila jedan od uslova kazina, time nema prednosti, a novac je pošteno osvojen (dobiti su proizašli iz njene sreće, a ne neke posebne prednosti). Stoga bismo zamolili predstavnike kazina da uzmu u obzir sve individualne specifičnosti ovog slučaja i preispitaju odluku o neplaćanju igrača.
Prema našoj internoj metodologiji, ako igrač ne dobije platu, žalba će biti klasifikovana kao "protiv poštenog kockanja" što će dovesti do smanjenja rejtinga kazina.
Hi angelbooty36,
Sorry, it took longer than expected.
Dear Spinago Casino team,
In Casino Guru we put lots of emphasis on fair gambling. This means that neither casino nor the player should get an unfair advantage. T&Cs of the casino should ensure that players get no unfair advantage over the casino. At the same time, they shouldn't be unfair to the players. You can read more in our Fair Gambling Codex: https://casino.guru/fair-gambling-codex-for-casinos. We also use this as a base for our decisions regarding complaints. The point is to create a safe and user-friendly environment for players even those who don't read the whole T&Cs (very few do) and aren't experienced gamers. The fact is that one account per person is a standard rule in the industry. But not every player is aware of that. The main point of this rule is protection from abusing welcome offers. If a player takes the welcome bonus twice, that is an unfair advantage and we agree that any winnings should be void. However, this is not the case here.
Let us summarize the key points of this case:
- The player opened the second account in good faith, unaware that it was against the rules
- The player didn't take a bonus, so there is no unfair advantage gained
- The player's first account was closed based on their request, it wasn't self-excluded for gaming problem
- The player's second account was fully verified. This is important because at this moment (if not sooner) the casino should have realized that the player already had an account. It's logical for the player to assume that if she passes verification everything is OK.
Considering all of this we believe that a fair approach from the casino would be to pay the player. Even though she unintentionally broke one of the casino terms, there is no advantage gained by that, and the money was won fairly (winnings resulted from her luck, not any special advantage). Therefore we would like to ask casino representatives to take all of the individual specifics of this case into account and reconsider the decision to not pay the player.
According to our internal methodology, if the player won't get paid, the complaint will be classified "against fair gambling" which will lead to a decrease in the casino's rating.
Automatski prevedeno: