Još uvek ne razumem kako i zašto me optužuju za varanje, jer su upravo rekli da postoje rupe u sistemu; ali to je definitivno nešto što sam pokušao da iskoristim?
Pobeda je zaista vredna, to nije uobičajena pojava. Varanje je varanje, ali ako je greška takvih rupa od tamo sistema...a da ne znam da uopšte postoje kako mogu da odgovaram kao varalica ako je jedina radnja bila da pritisnem dugme za okretanje?? U meri u kojoj me je to koštalo mog naloga, kada je greška tamošnjeg sistema trebalo da me košta samo dobitaka? Zašto moj nalog? Kako postoje dokazi koji ukazuju na to da sam znao za takve podvige za koje oni sigurno znaju da je bila moja namera da prevarim, do te mere da me drže direktno odgovornim za moje implicitne pokušaje da iskoristim takve ranjivosti?:
Da ne spominjemo čitavo ovo opravdanje konačne pobede, zašto ili kako je iko mogao iskreno da veruje da je to mogao da uradi da je sam znao da je prevario? Da li se od tada uopšte nisam trudio da se trudim osim ako se ne osećam kao da grešim u kazinu? Kao da sam dovoljno napisao u ovoj pritužbi iu svojoj recenziji, trebalo bi barem priznati moje napore da prenesem teško stanje pojedinca koji nije promenio svoju priču, odbijeno mi je objašnjenje kada sam se raspitivao o mom nalogu, pronađi oni me okrivljuju za moju implicitnu akciju da namerno iskoristim ranjivost i prihvatim to kao jedinu istinu dok mi se uskraćuju bilo kakvi pokušaji bez našeg kazino-gurua za pribegavanje.
Nemam snimak svojih okretaja, počinjem da verujem da bi ljudi tamo trebalo da snimaju korišćenje onlajn kazina, jer je to teška pilula za progutanje znajući da se moj dokaz pobede ne poklapa sa sistemom koji ja želim t dobiti nadoknadu. Da ću biti isplaćen samo u slučaju da se moj dokaz o pobedi poklapa sa sistemom pobede.
Ipak, i dalje treba da verujete u lakovernu perspektivu sistema koji će prihvatiti samo dokaz koji mu je pružio klijent ako i samo on odgovara podacima??
Da jedan od mojih okretaja nije odražavao dobitni kolut za isplatu na mojoj strani, zar ne bih pokušao da se pozabavim zabrinutošću koja bi me, ako to ne uradim, potencijalno koštala mog dobitka? Ne znam za vas, ali meni je jasno da je iskrenost ključna.
Takođe sam radoznao, koliko sam tačno puta pokušao da iskoristim ovu takozvanu "ranjivost", da li je bila statički? Ili dosledno? Koliko je ukupno okretaja bilo od trenutka kada sam osvojio 50 udst dok mi nalog nije bio zabranjen? Plus vremenske oznake svakog okretanja (idealno koje odražavaju moje lokalno vreme) kao takve treba da povezuju prilično dosledan prosek nekoga ko je stalno pritiskao dugme za okretanje da bi mogao da uradi da bude negde drugde? Varati? Kako tvrde? Reći ću da sam u noći mog uspeha bio usred mećave, zaglavio u nevolji, moj telefon i kazino su bili sve za šta sam morao da se držim. Da li su slučajno vremenske prilike i slaba snaga glasa mogli biti razlog mog uspeha?
Jer nisam, niti bih ikada prevario. Pobeda mi nije dovoljno važna da ne mogu da prihvatim da izgubim, sigurno sam preneo to uverenje.
Zašto bi me to na kraju koštalo mog računa, a ne samo grešaka koje je sistem slučajno isplatio. Toliko do tačke bez znanja o ranjivosti, niti implicitnog pokušaja eksploatacije takve rupe; da mi treba dokaz koji nikada ne bih morao da dokažem da sam u pravu u vezi sa bilo čim što se poklapa sa tamošnjim zapisima ako su jedini zaslužni zapisi oni koje podnesu?
Najmanje što su mogli da urade jeste da priznaju putem jasnog i sistemskog obrasca koji apsolutno nepobitno označava pokušaj da se iskorišćava bilo koju ranjivost za koju tvrde, između margina svakog okretanja.
🙁 Kao što sam rekao, nije me briga za novac. Znajući da sam pobedio, ne može uticati na moju odluku ako se zna da sam to uradio bez varanja; konačno prihvatanje sveta u kome bi neko mogao da izgubi dobitak u svetlu pogrešne isplate. Ali takođe morate da prihvatite da kazino može okriviti korisnika po cenu korisničkog naloga za nehotično iskorišćavanje ranjivosti za koju nisu znali da postoji?
Nemar ovog kazina bi ih trebao koštati mogućnosti rada, a ne mog naloga da mu pristupim. Trebalo bi da budem nagrađen za pomoć u sposobnosti da identifikujem ovu takozvanu „ranjivost" koju ni na koji način nisam pokušao da iskoristim ili izvučem profit.
Da su uzeli novac, mogao sam da živim sa tim. Treba da me slikaš prevaranta koji me košta mog naloga, linija je u pesku kakvu često povlači svako ko može da prepozna neslaganje između dve strane i svaki njihov napor treba da odražava slične događaje i da odgovara suprotstavljenoj verziji.
Bilo kakav dokaz koji imaju bolje da bude „poslednji ekser u kovčeg" koji potvrđuje moje direktne pokušaje da iskoristim ovu navodnu „ranjivost", plus datume i vreme svih okreta, i broj očiglednih pokušaja, moja implicitna direktna akcija je očigledno bila pokušaj prevare .
I still don't understand how or why I am being accused for cheating, as they just said there are holes in there system; but it's definitely something that I attempted to exploit?
Winning felt really rewarding , it's not a common occurrence. Cheating is cheating, but if the error of such holes are from there system...without knowing they even exist how can I be held accountable as Cheater if the only action was to press the spin button?? To the extend that it cost me my account, when the error of there system should have only ideally cost me the winnings? Why my account? How is there evidence indicative that reflects I had knowledge of such exploits to which they know for certain it was my intent to cheat, to the point of holding me directly accountable for my implicit attempts to exploit such vulnerabilities?:
Not to mention this whole vindication of finally winning, why or how could anyone honestly believe they could have done so if they them self knew they cheated? Does it even make since that I would go through all this effort unless I felt like I was being wrong by the casino? Like I'm I've written enough across this complaint and in my review that should at least be acknowledged for my efforts to convey the plight of an individual who hasn't changed his story, was denied clarification when inquiring about my account, find out they're blaming me for my implicit action to exploit a vulnerability purposely, and accept such as the only truth while being denied any attempts without our casino-guru for recourse.
I don't have footage of my spins, I'm starting to believe people should record there use of a online casino, cuz it's a tough pill to swallow knowing if my proof of a win, doesn't match the system I won't get compensated. That only in the the case that my proof of win matches the system of a win will I get paid out.
Yet still suppose to trust the credulous perspective of a system that will only accept client provided proof if and only it matches there records??
Had a single one of my spins not reflected a winning paying reel on my end, would I have not tried to address a concern that in not doing so could have potentially cost me my winnings? Like I don't know about you but its expressively clear to me honesty is key.
I'm also curious, exactly how many times did I attempt exploit this so called "vulnerability" was it statically? Or consistent? How many spins in total were there grom the time I won the 50 udst till my account was banned? Plus time stamps of every spin ( ideally reflecting my local time ) as such should correlate a pretty consistent average of someone who was constantly pushing a spin button to have been able to do be elsewhere? To cheat? As they claim? I will say that the night of my success I was in the middle of a blizzard, stuck in a no way outta predicament my phone and ya'll casino were all I had to hold on to. Could by chance the weather and poor singal strength be the reason of my success?
Cuz I didn't, nor would I ever cheat. Winning is not important enough to me that I can't accept to lose, surely I've conveyed this belief.
Why then should it in the end cost me my account and not just the errant funds there system accidentally paid out. So much to the point under no knowledge of a vulnerability, nor implicit attempt to exploit such hole; that I need proof I could never have to prove I'm right about anything that does match there records if the only creditable records are they ones they submit?
The least they could do is acknowledge via a clear and systemic pattern that absolutely undeniably signifies attempting to exploit whatever vulnerability they claim, in between the margins of each spin.
🙁 As I said I don't care about the money. Knowing I won, can't effect my resolve if known I did so without cheating; ultimately accepting a world that one might lose winnings inlight of an errant payout. But also need to accept that a casino can blame the user at the cost of the users account for there involuntary inadvertent exploit of a vulnerability they didn't know existed?
The negligence of this casino should cost them there ability to operate, not my account ability to access it. I should be rewarded for aiding there ability to identifying this so called "vulnerability" I in absolutely no way attempted to exploit or gleaned profit from.
Had they taken the money, I could have lived with that. There need to paint me cheater costing me my account, is the line in the sand as it often drawn by anyone who can recognize the discrepancy between two sides and each of their efforts should reflect similar events and correspond with the opposed version.
Any evidence they have better be a "last nail in the coffin) definitive of my direct attempts to exploit this supposed "vulnerability", plus the dates and times of all spins, and numbers of apparent attempts my implicit direct action was clearly an attempt cheat.
Automatski prevedeno: