Hvala na odgovoru.
Dozvolite mi da sumiram naš pristup kada razmatramo slučaj za povraćaj depozita zbog neuspelog samoisključenja:
Verujemo da bi kazino trebalo da spreči igrače koji obaveštavaju kazino o problemima kockanja ili zavisnosti da dalje igraju tako što će blokirati svoj nalog u razumnom roku. Ako takva zaštita ne uspe, kazino treba da vrati depozite igrača.
Međutim, da bismo nastavili sa traženjem sredstava od kazina, potreban nam je dokaz da je kazino obavešten o vašem problemu sa kockanjem. Imajte na umu da kazino nije u obavezi da nam kaže ništa drugo osim onoga što su vam već rekli. Ako nema dokaza, nemamo šanse da se suočimo sa kazinom.
Zato bih želeo da vas pitam da li postoji bilo kakav dokaz da ste obavestili kazino o svom problemu sa kockanjem pre nego što je vaše prvo samoisključivanje aktivirano ili pre nego što je vaš kazino nalog ponovo otvoren.
Izvinjavam se zbog neprijatnosti.
Thanks for your reply.
Please let me sum up our approach when we consider a case for a refund of deposits due to failed self-exclusion:
We believe the casino should prevent players who inform the casino about gambling problems or addiction from playing further by blocking their account in a reasonable time. If such protection fails the casino should return the player's deposits.
However, for us to proceed with requesting the funds from the casino, we need proof the casino was informed about your gambling issue. Please understand the casino is not obligated to tell us anything else other than what they already told you. If there is no proof, we stand no chance of confronting the casino.
That is why I would like to ask you if there is any proof you informed the casino about your gambling problem before your first self-exclusion was activated or before your casino account was reopened.
I apologize for the inconvenience.
Automatski prevedeno: