Podnosim ovu žalbu u vezi sa neopravdanom zabranom mog naloga NanoGames i zadržavanjem mog legitimnog dobitka. Iako je platforma ponudila i vratila moje depozite (17137,3177 TRKS i 200 USDT TRC20), oni odbijaju da ispoštuju moj zakoniti dobitak od oko 24000 dolara na osnovu tri optužbe, koje sve mogu opovrgnuti dokazima.
Specifična pitanja:
1. Optužba za prevaru partnera:
- NanoGames tvrdi da sam učestvovao u prevari podružnica
– Dao sam dokaze koji pokazuju da su sumnjive filijale povezane sa korisnikom „Goombas" iz Kanade
- Mogu da pokažem kroz verifikaciju IP adrese da ovi nalozi nisu povezani sa mnom
- Zdrav razum nalaže da, da vodim prevaru sa partnerima, ne bih koristio svoje ime
- Sva sumnjiva povlačenja mogu se pratiti na Gumbasovim adresama, a ne na mojoj
2. Lažno predstavljanje na nalogu:
– NanoGames tvrdi da sam upravljao sa više naloga („Ralph Gerken" i „Gerken")
– Imam postojeći tiket za podršku koji dokumentuje da sam prijavio da me lažno predstavlja drugi korisnik koristeći ime „gerken"
- Ovaj izveštaj je napravljen 3 nedelje ili duže pre aktuelnih optužbi
- Prkosi logici da bih prijavio svoj alternativni nalog za lažno predstavljanje
3. Optužba za trgovinu na nalogu:
- Platforma je pogrešno protumačila razgovor u ćaskanju o drugom sajtu za igre
– U pitanju je korisnik 22. nivoa, a ne 49. kao što je diskutovano
- Razgovor se jasno vodio o drugoj platformi
- Korisnik je eksplicitno rekao da ne može da koristi Telegram, sprečavajući bilo kakvu transakciju van platforme
- Imam dnevnike ćaskanja koji pokazuju da sam odbio ponude korisnika "VinOrLose" i "GBRS" kada su me pitali da li sam zainteresovan za nanogames.io nalog na koji sam odbio i rekao im da mi ne trebaju ili ne zahtevaju ni sada ni ikada jer ne postoji njihovo korišćenje uopšte
Prethodna komunikacija:
- Višestruki pokušaji rešavanja putem direktne komunikacije sa podrškom za NanoGames
- Dopisivao se sa Rai
- Obezbedili svu traženu dokumentaciju i dokaze
- Nikada nisu izdata nikakva prethodna upozorenja na moj nalog uprkos suprotnim tvrdnjama
- Bio sam svakodnevno aktivan igrač sa pozitivnim stanjem u zajednici
Trenutni status:
- Nalog ostaje zabranjen
- Dobici se i dalje zadržavaju
- Nudi se samo vraćanje nedavnih depozita
- Uprava odbija da pregleda pružene dokaze
- Nisu dostavljene posebne vremenske oznake ili dokazi o navodnim upozorenjima
Tražena rezolucija:
1. Potpuni pregled svih dokaza koje sam pružio
2. Detaljno objašnjenje svih navodnih prethodnih upozorenja sa vremenskim oznakama
3. Istraga mog prethodnog izveštaja o lažnom predstavljanju
4. Oslobađanje legitimnih dobitaka osim pukog vraćanja depozita
5. Ponovno aktiviranje mog naloga
6. Ako je potrebno, spreman sam da pružim dodatnu dokumentaciju ili verifikaciju
Bio sam lojalan, svakodnevni igrač na platformi i održavao sam čistu igru. Vreme ove zabrane koje se poklapa sa značajnim zahtevom za povlačenje izaziva ozbiljnu zabrinutost u vezi sa integritetom platforme. Zahtevam temeljnu, transparentnu reviziju mog slučaja na osnovu dokaza, a ne pretpostavki.
Ostajem potpuno spreman da sarađujem u svakoj istrazi i mogu da pružim dodatne dokaze po potrebi. Zajednica me poznaje kao uzornog igrača i dosledno sam nastojao da održim tu reputaciju.
I am filing this complaint regarding the unjustified banning of my NanoGames account and the withholding of my legitimate winnings. While the platform has offered and returned my deposits (17137.3177 TRX and 200 USDT TRC20), they are refusing to honor my rightful winnings approx $24000 based on three allegations, all of which I can disprove with evidence.
Specific Issues:
1. Affiliate Fraud Allegation:
- NanoGames claims I engaged in affiliate fraud
- I have provided evidence showing the suspicious affiliates are connected to user "Goombas" from Canada
- I can demonstrate through IP verification that these accounts are not connected to me
- Common sense dictates that if I were running affiliate fraud, I wouldn't use my own name
- All suspicious withdrawals can be traced to Goombas' addresses, not mine
2. Account Impersonation:
- NanoGames claims I operated multiple accounts ("Ralph Gerken" and "Gerken")
- I have an existing support ticket documenting that I reported being impersonated by another user using the name "gerken"
- This report was made 3 weeks or longer before the current allegations
- It defies logic that I would report my own alternate account for impersonation
3. Account Trading Accusation:
- The platform misinterpreted a chat conversation about a different gaming site
- The user in question was Level 22, not Level 49 as discussed
- The conversation was clearly about another platform
- The user explicitly stated they couldn't use Telegram, preventing any off-platform transaction
- I have chat logs showing I declined offers from users "WinOrLose" and "GBRS" when they inquired if I was interested in nanogames.io account to which I declined and told them I dont need or require them now or ever because there is no use of them at all
Prior Communication:
- Multiple attempts to resolve through direct communication with NanoGames support
- Corresponded with Rai
- Provided all requested documentation and evidence
- No prior warnings were ever issued to my account despite claims to the contrary
- I have been a daily active player with a positive community standing
Current Status:
- Account remains banned
- Winnings continue to be withheld
- Only offered return of recent deposits
- Management refuses to review provided evidence
- No specific timestamps or evidence of alleged warnings provided
Requested Resolution:
1. Full review of all evidence I've provided
2. Detailed explanation of any alleged prior warnings with timestamps
3. Investigation of my prior impersonation report
4. Release of legitimate winnings beyond mere deposit returns
5. Reinstatement of my account
6. If needed, I am willing to provide additional documentation or verification
I have been a loyal, daily player on the platform and have maintained a clean playing record. The timing of this ban coinciding with a significant withdrawal request raises serious concerns about the platform's integrity. I request a thorough, transparent review of my case based on evidence rather than assumptions.
I remain fully prepared to cooperate with any investigation and can provide additional evidence as needed. The community knows me as a role model player, and I have consistently strived to maintain that reputation.
Automatski prevedeno: